Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft - Results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years

被引:58
作者
Kawanabe, K. [1 ]
Akiyama, H. [1 ]
Onishi, E. [1 ]
Nakamura, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2007年 / 89B卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18037
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We retrospectively evaluated 42 hips which had undergone acetabular reconstruction using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device between September 1994 and December 1998. We used autogenous bone chips from the ilium and ceramic particle morsellised grafts, even in large acetabular bone defects, in the early stages of the study. Thereafter, femoral head allograft was used as bulk graft in patients with large acetabular defects. Ceramic blocks and the patients' contralateral femoral head were also used as bulk graft. The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (4.3 to 12). Survivorship analysis was performed using radiological failure of the acetabular component, irrespective of whether it was revised, or not, as the end-point. The survival rate of the morsellised graft group (25 hips) and the bulk graft group (17 hips) at ten years was 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 42.5% to 63.5%) and 82% (95% CI 72.4% to 91.6%), respectively. The mid-term results of revision total hip replacement with the Kerboull device were better when bulk graft was used in any size of bone defect.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AMSTUTZ HC, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P21
[2]   REVISION ARTHROPLASTY USING AN ANTI-PROTRUSIO CAGE FOR MASSIVE ACETABULAR BONE DEFICIENCY [J].
BERRY, DJ ;
MULLER, ME .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (05) :711-715
[3]   RESULTS OF REVISION FOR MECHANICAL FAILURE AFTER CEMENTED TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT, 1979 TO 1982 - A 2 TO 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
CALLAGHAN, JJ ;
SALVATI, EA ;
PELLICCI, PM ;
WILSON, PD ;
RANAWAT, CS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (07) :1074-1085
[4]  
DANTONIO JA, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P126
[5]  
DELEE JG, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P20
[6]   Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft - Study with a minimum five-year follow-up [J].
Garbuz, D ;
Morsi, E ;
Gross, AE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (05) :693-697
[7]   Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gerber, A ;
Pisan, M ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Isler, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12) :2358-2364
[8]   The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices [J].
Gill, TJ ;
Sledge, JB ;
Müller, ME .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (01) :1-7
[9]  
HAENTJENS P, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P225
[10]   BONE-GRAFTING FOR PROTRUSIO-ACETABULI DURING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - A REVIEW OF THE WRIGHTINGTON METHOD IN 61 HIPS [J].
HIRST, P ;
ESSER, M ;
MURPHY, JCM ;
HARDINGE, K .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (02) :229-233