United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect

被引:32
作者
Ariyanto, Amarina [1 ]
Hornsey, Matthew J. [1 ]
Gallois, Cindy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
RESPONSES; IDENTITY; CRITICISMS; INGROUP; DISSENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.628
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Ingroup members who criticize their group face much less resistance than outgroup members who say the same thing (the intergroup sensitivity effect). In the context of intergroup conflict, however, it was predicted that treatment of ingroup critics would not be so generous. Muslim Indonesians read an extract from an interview in which the speaker criticized Muslims. The comments were attributed to either another Muslim or to a Christian. Before reading the criticism, half of the participants had read an article describing intense conflict between Muslims and Christians in Indonesia, whereas the other half read a neutral article. As predicted, negativity toward the ingroup critic and the ingroup critic's comments increased in the conflict salience condition, to the point that the intergroup sensitivity effect disappeared. However, conflict salience did not have an effect on attributions of motive or on agreement with the message. Implications for our understanding of "patriotic criticism" are discussed. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes
[2]   Group-directed criticism in Indonesia: Role of message source and audience [J].
Ariyanto, Amarina ;
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Gallois, Cindy .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 9 (02) :96-102
[3]   Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticisms of the ingroup [J].
Elder, TJ ;
Sutton, RM ;
Douglas, KM .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2005, 8 (03) :231-244
[4]   INFORMAL SOCIAL COMMUNICATION [J].
FESTINGER, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1950, 57 (05) :271-282
[5]  
Hornsey M.J., 2005, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V16, P301, DOI [10.1080/10463280500436040, DOI 10.1080/10463280500436040]
[6]   Strategic defensiveness: Public and private responses to group criticism [J].
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Frederiks, Elisha ;
Smith, Joanne R. ;
Ford, Lindsay .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 46 :697-716
[7]   Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism [J].
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Robson, Erin ;
Smith, Joanne ;
Esposo, Sarah ;
Sutton, Robbie M. .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2008, 34 (01) :70-U119
[8]   Group-directed criticisms and recommendations tor change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers [J].
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Grice, Tim ;
Jetten, Jolanda ;
Paulsen, Neil ;
Callan, Victor .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (07) :1036-1048
[9]   The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members [J].
Hornsey, MJ ;
Jetten, J ;
McAuliffe, BJ ;
Hogg, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (01) :57-68
[10]   Keeping it in-house: How audience affects responses to group criticism [J].
Hornsey, MJ ;
De Bruijn, P ;
Creed, J ;
Allen, J ;
Ariyanto, A ;
Svensson, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (03) :291-312