Robust technology policy against emission leakage: The case of upstream subsidies

被引:24
|
作者
Fischer, Carolyn [1 ]
Greaker, Mads [2 ,3 ]
Rosendahl, Knut Einar [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, FEEM, CESifo Res Network, Resources Future, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] CREE, Stat Norway, Durham, NC USA
[3] CESifo Res Network, Munich, Germany
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, CREE, As, Norway
关键词
Emission leakage; Strategic environmental policy; Abatement subsidies; Asymmetric carbon taxes; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; INDUSTRIAL-POLICY; TRADE; CARBON; TAX; ADJUSTMENTS; PERMITS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Asymmetric regulation of a global pollutant between countries can alter the competitiveness of industries and lead to emissions leakage, which hampers countries' welfare. In order to limit leakage, governments consider supporting domestic trade-exposed firms by subsidizing their investments in abatement technology. The suppliers of such technologies tend to be less than perfectly competitive, particularly when both emissions regulations and advanced technologies are new. In this context of twin market failures, we consider the relative effects and desirability of subsidies for abatement technology. We find a more robust recommendation for upstream subsidies than for downstream subsidies. Downstream subsidies tend to increase global abatement technology prices, reduce pollution abatement abroad and increase emission leakage. On the contrary, upstream subsidies reduce abatement technology prices, and hence also emissions leakage. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 61
页数:18
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Environmental policy with upstream pollution abatement technology firms
    Greaker, Mads
    Rosendahl, Knut Einar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 56 (03) : 246 - 259
  • [2] Policy Implementation Inconsistency and Emission Leakage: Evidence from The Closure of Polluting Firms
    Wang, Xurui
    Liu, Mengdi
    Liu, BeiBei
    Zhang, Bing
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 70 (02) : 201 - 214
  • [3] Policy analysis for emission-reduction with green technology investment in manufacturing
    Bian, Junsong
    Guo, Xiaolong
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 316 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [4] Optimal Technology Investment under Emission Trading Policy
    Huang, Shuo
    Wen, Zhong
    Chen, Jian
    Cui, Ning
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 29 (02): : 143 - 162
  • [5] Policy Implementation Inconsistency and Emission Leakage: Evidence from The Closure of Polluting Firms
    Xurui Wang
    Mengdi Liu
    BeiBei Liu
    Bing Zhang
    Environmental Management, 2022, 70 : 201 - 214
  • [6] Leakage in regional environmental policy: The case of the regional greenhouse gas initiative
    Fell, Harrison
    Maniloff, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 87 : 1 - 23
  • [7] CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY IN SHIPPING FOCUSING ON EMISSION STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY MEASURES
    Kontovas, Christos A.
    Psaraftis, Harilaos N.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 10 (10): : 1589 - 1596
  • [8] Technology transfer in the offset policy: the case of the radiotherapy expansion pear
    Santos Gomes, Myller Augusto
    Kovaleski, Joao Luiz
    Pagani, Regina Negri
    Zammar, Gilberto
    NAVUS-REVISTA DE GESTAO E TECNOLOGIA, 2019, 9 (01): : 182 - 191
  • [9] The Criminogenic Nature of Food Production Harm Responses: A Case Study of Anaerobic Digestion Technology Subsidies in Northern Ireland
    Gladkova, Ekaterina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR CRIME JUSTICE AND SOCIAL DEMOCRACY, 2022, 11 (02) : 222 - 236
  • [10] A case against the trickle-down effect in technology ecosystems
    Zhang, Guanglu
    Allaire, Douglas
    Shankar, Venkatesh
    McAdams, Daniel A.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):