Implementation of Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression at an Academic Medical Center without Ambulatory Surgery Centers: A Cost Analysis and Systematic Review

被引:5
作者
Safaee, Michael M. [1 ]
Chang, Diana [1 ]
Hillman, John M. [2 ]
Shah, Sumedh S. [1 ]
Garcia, Joseph [1 ]
Wadhwa, Harsh [1 ]
Ames, Christopher P. [1 ]
Clark, Aaron J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Med Ctr, Adult Business Line Finance, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Ambulatory surgical center (ASC); Cost; Inpatient; Lumbar decompression; Minimally invasive; Outpatient; CONVENTIONAL MICRODISKECTOMY; TUBULAR DISKECTOMY; UTILITY ANALYSIS; SPINE SURGERY; SHORT-TERM; TRENDS; MICRODISCECTOMY; SCIATICA; OUTCOMES; FUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lumbar decompressions are increasingly performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). We sought to compare costs of open and minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar decompressions performed at a university without dedicated ASCs. METHODS: Lumbar decompressions performed at a tertiary academic hospital or satellite university hospital dedicated to outpatient surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Care pathways were same-day, overnight observation, or inpatient admission. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgical characteristics, 30-day readmission, and costs were collected. A systematic review of lumbar decompression cost literature was performed. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients, mean age 55 years with 128 women (36.2%), were reviewed. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, or Charlson Comorbidity Index between patients treated with open and minimally invasive surgery. Open decompression was associated with higher total cost ($21,280 vs. $14,407; P < 0.001); however, this was driven by care pathway and length of stay. When stratifying by care pathway, there was no difference in total cost between open versus minimally invasive surgery among same-day ($10,609 vs. $11,074; P = 0.556), overnight observation ($14,097 vs. $13,992; P = 0.918), or inpatient admissions ($24,507 vs. $27,929; P = 0.311). CONCLUSIONS: When accounting for care pathway, the cost of open and MIS decompression were no different. Transition from a tertiary academic hospital to a university hospital specializing in outpatient surgery was not associated with lower costs. Academic departments may consider transitioning lumbar decompressions to a dedicated ASC to maximize cost savings; however, additional studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:E961 / E971
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery [J].
Al-Khouja, Lutfi T. ;
Baron, Eli M. ;
Johnson, J. Patrick ;
Kim, Terrence T. ;
Drazin, Doniel .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 36 (06) :E4
[2]   Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for Sciatica A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Arts, Mark P. ;
Brand, Ronald ;
van den Akker, M. Elske ;
Koes, Bart W. ;
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. ;
Peul, Wilco C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (02) :149-158
[3]   National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease [J].
Baird, Evan O. ;
Egorova, Natalia N. ;
McAnany, Steven J. ;
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. ;
Hecht, Andrew C. ;
Cho, Samuel K. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 4 (03) :143-149
[4]   Lumbar microdiscectomy: subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption [J].
Brock, Marko ;
Kunkel, Philip ;
Papavero, Luca .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (04) :518-522
[5]   A Comparison of Acute Hospital Charges After Tubular versus Open Microdiskectomy [J].
Cahill, Kevin S. ;
Levi, Allan D. ;
Cummock, Matthew D. ;
Liao, Wensheng ;
Wang, Michael Y. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 80 (1-2) :208-212
[6]  
Cassidy A, 2014, HLTH POLICY BRIEF SI, DOI [10.1377/hpb20140724.283836/full/, DOI 10.1377/HPB20140724.283836/FULL]
[7]   Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference? [J].
Cheng, Jason S. ;
Park, Priscilla ;
Le, Hai ;
Reisner, Lori ;
Chou, Dean ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
[8]  
DelSole Edward M, 2019, J Spine Surg, V5, pS124, DOI 10.21037/jss.2019.04.12
[9]   Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up [J].
Dhall, Sanjay S. ;
Wang, Michael Y. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) :560-565
[10]   Cost Savings From Utilization of an Ambulatory Surgery Center for Orthopaedic Day Surgery [J].
Fabricant, Peter D. ;
Seeley, Mark A. ;
Rozell, Joshua C. ;
Fieldston, Evan ;
Flynn, John M. ;
Wells, Lawrence M. ;
Ganley, Theodore J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (12) :865-871