CSSG: A cost-sensitive stacked generalization approach for software defect prediction

被引:9
作者
Eivazpour, Zeinab [1 ,2 ]
Keyvanpour, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Alzahra Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Alzahra Univ, Data Min Lab, Tehran, Iran
关键词
class imbalance learning; cost of misclassification; cost‐ sensitive learning; data imbalance; ensemble learning; software defect prediction; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS; STATISTICAL COMPARISONS; DECISION TREES; ENSEMBLE; QUALITY; CLASSIFIERS; DIVERSITY; SYSTEM; FAULTS;
D O I
10.1002/stvr.1761
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The prediction of software artifacts on defect-prone (DP) or non-defect-prone (NDP) classes during the testing phase helps minimize software business costs, which is a classification task in software defect prediction (SDP) field. Machine learning methods are helpful for the task, although they face the challenge of data imbalance distribution. The challenge leads to serious misclassification of artifacts, which will disrupt the predictor's performance. The previously developed stacking ensemble methods do not consider the cost issue to handle the class imbalance problem (CIP) over the training dataset in the SDP field. To bridge this research gap, in the cost-sensitive stacked generalization (CSSG) approach, we try to combine the staking ensemble learning method with cost-sensitive learning (CSL) since the CSL purpose is to reduce misclassification costs. In the cost-sensitive stacked generalization (CSSG) approach, logistic regression (LR) and extremely randomized trees classifiers in cases of CSL and cost-insensitive are used as a final classifier of stacking scheme. To evaluate the performance of CSSG, we use six performance measures. Several experiments are carried out to compare the CSSG with some cost-sensitive ensemble methods on 15 benchmark datasets with different imbalance levels. The results indicate that the CSSG can be an effective solution to the CIP than other compared methods.
引用
收藏
页数:48
相关论文
共 159 条
[71]  
King G., 2001, POLITICAL ANAL, V9, P137, DOI [10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.PAN.A004868]
[72]  
Kohavi R., 1996, Machine Learning. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference (ICML '96), P275
[73]  
LECESSIE S, 1992, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V41, P191
[74]  
Lemaître G, 2017, J MACH LEARN RES, V18
[75]   Benchmarking classification models for software defect prediction: A proposed framework and novel findings [J].
Lessmann, Stefan ;
Baesens, Bart ;
Mues, Christophe ;
Pietsch, Swantje .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, 34 (04) :485-496
[76]   Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research [J].
Lessmann, Stefan ;
Baesens, Bart ;
Seow, Hsin-Vonn ;
Thomas, Lyn C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 247 (01) :124-136
[77]   Software Defect Prediction via Convolutional Neural Network [J].
Li, Jian ;
He, Pinjia ;
Zhu, Jieming ;
Lyu, Michael R. .
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS), 2017, :318-328
[78]   On the Multiple Sources and Privacy Preservation Issues for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction [J].
Li, Zhiqiang ;
Jing, Xiao-Yuan ;
Zhu, Xiaoke ;
Zhang, Hongyu ;
Xu, Baowen ;
Ying, Shi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2019, 45 (04) :391-411
[79]   Progress on approaches to software defect prediction [J].
Li, Zhiqiang ;
Jing, Xiao-Yuan ;
Zhu, Xiaoke .
IET SOFTWARE, 2018, 12 (03) :161-175
[80]   Heterogeneous fault prediction with cost-sensitive domain adaptation [J].
Li, Zhiqiang ;
Jing, Xiao-Yuan ;
Zhu, Xiaoke .
SOFTWARE TESTING VERIFICATION & RELIABILITY, 2018, 28 (02)