Contact dermatitis due to use of Octenisept® in wound care

被引:24
作者
Calow, Trevis [1 ]
Oberle, Kristina [1 ]
Bruckner-Tuderman, Leena [1 ]
Jakob, Thilo [1 ]
Schumann, Hauke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hautklin Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT | 2009年 / 7卷 / 09期
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; irritant contact dermatitis; octenisept; chronic wound; phenoxyethanol; cocamidopropyl betaine; COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE; LEG ULCERS; PATCH TEST; ALLERGY; 3-DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE; SENSITIZATION; AMIDOAMINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07035.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Octenisept (R), containing 0.1 % octenidine/2 % phenoxyethanol, is a widely used antiseptic in modern wound management. It is considered to have a very low allergenic potential. Thus far, neither allergic nor irritant contact dermatitis to the product has been described. Patients and methods: Chronic wounds in 251 patients were treated with Octenisept (R); 11 developed signs of contact dermatitis. The symptoms improved after discontinuation of the antiseptic. Eight of these patients were patch tested to the antiseptic and its components. Results: The eight patients all showed a positive reaction to the product. In at least three cases a reaction to the components cocamidopropyl betaine and phenoxyethanol was found, but not to octenidine dihydrochloride. Conclusions: In this cohort, more than three percent of the treated patients developed a contact dermatitis to the antiseptic. However, the differentiation between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis towards the ingredients of the antiseptic remains problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 766
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   3-DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE - A KEY SUBSTANCE IN CONTACT ALLERGY TO COCAMIDOPROPYLBETAINE [J].
ANGELINI, G ;
FOTI, C ;
RIGANO, L ;
VENA, GA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 32 (02) :96-99
[2]  
ARNOLD R, 2006, EPIKUTANTESTREIHEN D
[3]   Compound allergy [J].
Bashir, SJ ;
Maibach, HI .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (04) :179-183
[4]  
BRANDAO FM, 2004, CONTACT DERMATITIS, P638
[5]  
Brasch Jochen, 2007, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, V5, P943, DOI 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06523.x
[6]   Analysis of antibiotic susceptibilities of skin wound flora in hospitalized dermatology patients - The crisis of antibiotic resistance has come to the surface [J].
Colsky, AS ;
Kirsner, RS ;
Kerdel, FA .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (08) :1006-1009
[7]  
Dill-Müller D, 2005, HAUTARZT, V56, P164, DOI 10.1007/s00105-004-0895-0
[8]   Modern wound dressings for the therapy of chronic wounds [J].
Dissemond J. .
Der Hautarzt, 2006, 57 (10) :881-887
[9]   The role of 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine [J].
Foti, C ;
Bonamonte, D ;
Mascolo, G ;
Corcelli, A ;
Lobasso, S ;
Rigano, L ;
Angelini, G .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 48 (04) :194-198
[10]   Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study [J].
Fowler, JF ;
Fowler, LM ;
Hunter, JE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (06) :276-281