Contact dermatitis due to use of Octenisept® in wound care

被引:24
作者
Calow, Trevis [1 ]
Oberle, Kristina [1 ]
Bruckner-Tuderman, Leena [1 ]
Jakob, Thilo [1 ]
Schumann, Hauke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hautklin Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT | 2009年 / 7卷 / 09期
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; irritant contact dermatitis; octenisept; chronic wound; phenoxyethanol; cocamidopropyl betaine; COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE; LEG ULCERS; PATCH TEST; ALLERGY; 3-DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE; SENSITIZATION; AMIDOAMINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07035.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Octenisept (R), containing 0.1 % octenidine/2 % phenoxyethanol, is a widely used antiseptic in modern wound management. It is considered to have a very low allergenic potential. Thus far, neither allergic nor irritant contact dermatitis to the product has been described. Patients and methods: Chronic wounds in 251 patients were treated with Octenisept (R); 11 developed signs of contact dermatitis. The symptoms improved after discontinuation of the antiseptic. Eight of these patients were patch tested to the antiseptic and its components. Results: The eight patients all showed a positive reaction to the product. In at least three cases a reaction to the components cocamidopropyl betaine and phenoxyethanol was found, but not to octenidine dihydrochloride. Conclusions: In this cohort, more than three percent of the treated patients developed a contact dermatitis to the antiseptic. However, the differentiation between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis towards the ingredients of the antiseptic remains problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 766
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] 3-DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYLAMINE - A KEY SUBSTANCE IN CONTACT ALLERGY TO COCAMIDOPROPYLBETAINE
    ANGELINI, G
    FOTI, C
    RIGANO, L
    VENA, GA
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 32 (02) : 96 - 99
  • [2] ARNOLD R, 2006, EPIKUTANTESTREIHEN D
  • [3] Compound allergy
    Bashir, SJ
    Maibach, HI
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (04) : 179 - 183
  • [4] BRANDAO FM, 2004, CONTACT DERMATITIS, P638
  • [5] Brasch Jochen, 2007, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, V5, P943, DOI 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06523.x
  • [6] Analysis of antibiotic susceptibilities of skin wound flora in hospitalized dermatology patients - The crisis of antibiotic resistance has come to the surface
    Colsky, AS
    Kirsner, RS
    Kerdel, FA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (08) : 1006 - 1009
  • [7] Dill-Müller D, 2005, HAUTARZT, V56, P164, DOI 10.1007/s00105-004-0895-0
  • [8] Modern wound dressings for the therapy of chronic wounds
    Dissemond J.
    [J]. Der Hautarzt, 2006, 57 (10): : 881 - 887
  • [9] The role of 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine
    Foti, C
    Bonamonte, D
    Mascolo, G
    Corcelli, A
    Lobasso, S
    Rigano, L
    Angelini, G
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 48 (04) : 194 - 198
  • [10] Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study
    Fowler, JF
    Fowler, LM
    Hunter, JE
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 37 (06) : 276 - 281