Seismic fragility curves for structures using non-parametric representations

被引:85
作者
Mai, Chu [1 ]
Konakli, Katerina [1 ]
Sudret, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Struct Engn, Risk Safety & Uncertainty Quantificat, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
earthquake engineering; fragility curves; lognormal assumption; non-parametric approach; kernel density estimation; epistemic uncertainty; DEMAND MODELS; COLLAPSE RISK; EARTHQUAKE; STEEL; METHODOLOGY; SIMULATION; BUILDINGS; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11709-017-0385-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fragility curves are commonly used in civil engineering to assess the vulnerability of structures to earthquakes. The probability of failure associated with a prescribed criterion (e.g., the maximal inter-storey drift of a building exceeding a certain threshold) is represented as a function of the intensity of the earthquake ground motion (e.g., peak ground acceleration or spectral acceleration). The classical approach relies on assuming a lognormal shape of the fragility curves; it is thus parametric. In this paper, we introduce two non-parametric approaches to establish the fragility curves without employing the above assumption, namely binned Monte Carlo simulation and kernel density estimation. As an illustration, we compute the fragility curves for a three-storey steel frame using a large number of synthetic ground motions. The curves obtained with the non-parametric approaches are compared with respective curves based on the lognormal assumption. A similar comparison is presented for a case when a limited number of recorded ground motions is available. It is found that the accuracy of the lognormal curves depends on the ground motion intensity measure, the failure criterion and most importantly, on the employed method for estimating the parameters of the lognormal shape.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 186
页数:18
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EUROCODE 3 DESIGN 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EUROCODE 8 DESIGN 1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 11 INT C STRUCT SA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EUROCODE 1 ACTIONS 1
[5]   Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits [J].
Argyroudis, S. A. ;
Pitilakis, K. D. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 35 :1-12
[6]   Story-specific demand models and seismic fragility estimates for multi-story buildings [J].
Bai, Jong-Wha ;
Gardoni, Paolo ;
Hueste, Mary Beth D. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (01) :96-107
[7]   Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation [J].
Baker, Jack W. ;
Cornell, C. Allin .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) :236-252
[8]   Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (13) :1861-1883
[9]   Nonlinear static procedure for seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges [J].
Banerjee, S. ;
Shinozuka, M. .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2007, 22 (04) :293-305
[10]   Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis [J].
Banerjee, Swagata ;
Shinozuka, Masanobu .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (01) :12-22