Application of monod two-substrate kinetics with an intermediate for anaerobic co-digestion of distillery wastewater and molasses/glycerol waste in batch experiments

被引:5
作者
Phayungphan, K. [1 ]
Rakmak, N. [1 ,2 ]
Promraksa, A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
[2] Walailak Univ, Biomass & Oil Palm Excellence Ctr, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
来源
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2020年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
anaerobic co-digestion; crude glycerol; distillery wastewater; intermediate; molasses; monod two-substrate kinetics;
D O I
10.2166/wpt.2020.081
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is a highly complex process, particularly in co-digestion between poorly-defined, complex co-substrates like distillery wastewater, molasses, and crude glycerine. Thus, in this article, the authors tackled the problems by using Monod two-substrate with an intermediate (M2SI) model to represent accumulated biomethane evolution (ABE) obtained from the co-substrates, including easily degradable, slowly degradable substrates and intermediate. The M2SI model predictions were compared with the traditional Monod model's simulation results to clarify an outstanding of the present model in the aspect of modeling and control. Different behaviors of ABE curves from batch experiments were used to calibrate the M2SI model prediction with sensitivity analysis of the model parameters. It was found that the M2SI model gives a correct trend to describe the co-digestion process with multiple substrates and complex microbial activities with satisfactory fitting accuracy. At the same time, simple Monod kinetics have a good fit for dilute pure distillery wastewater, but the estimated microbial growth kinetics were counterintuitive. Therefore, the M2SI Model has a broader range of applications for co-digestion dealing with the complexity of multiple microbial activities to consume inherently complex or artificial co-substrates.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1082
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes
    Alvarez, J. A.
    Otero, L.
    Lema, J. M.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (04) : 1153 - 1158
  • [2] Amon Th., 2006, INT C SERIES, V1293, P217, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ICS.2006.03.007
  • [3] Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays
    Angelidaki, I.
    Alves, M.
    Bolzonella, D.
    Borzacconi, L.
    Campos, J. L.
    Guwy, A. J.
    Kalyuzhnyi, S.
    Jenicek, P.
    van Lier, J. B.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) : 927 - 934
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V16th
  • [5] Arzate J. A., 2019, THESIS U BERLIN BERL
  • [6] Anaerobic Digestion Model (AM2) for the Description of Biogas Processes at Dynamic Feedstock Loading Rates
    Arzate, Juan A.
    Kirstein, Max
    Ertem, Funda C.
    Kielhorn, Erich
    Ramirez Malule, Howard
    Neubauer, Peter
    Cruz-Bournazou, M. Nicolas
    Junne, Stefan
    [J]. CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2017, 89 (05) : 686 - 695
  • [7] Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process
    Bernard, O
    Hadj-Sadok, Z
    Dochain, D
    Genovesi, A
    Steyer, JP
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2001, 75 (04) : 424 - 438
  • [8] Charnplakorn C., 2008, THESIS CHULALONGKORN
  • [9] Modeling of the anaerobic digestion of organic waste for biogas production
    Fedailaine, M.
    Moussi, K.
    Khitous, M.
    Abada, S.
    Saber, M.
    Tirichine, N.
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT-2015), THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2015), 2015, 52 : 730 - 737
  • [10] Kinetic Model of Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Thai Rice Noodle Wastewater (Khanomjeen) with Chicken Manure
    Jijai, Sunwanee
    Siripatana, Chairat
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2017, 138 : 386 - 392