Characteristics of drills related to development of skills

被引:11
作者
Luik, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Dept Educ, EE-50090 Tartu, Estonia
关键词
elementary education; evaluation of CAL systems; media in education;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00201.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
It is important for the teacher to choose effective software for students. It is also important for designers to know what features of educational software make it effective. But the results of studies dealing with the effectiveness of educational software are contradictory. One reason for such results might be the fact that meta-analysis covers different kinds of educational software, simulations and drills for example, but it is hard to compare them. Another reason might be that the conditions (instruments, subjects, etc.) of the various studies were different. A third possibility might be that a particular type of educational software could consist of both good and bad characteristics. Therefore, research is needed on the characteristics of educational software. This type of study focuses on a particular kind of educational software, and this article is about the findings of one such study, exploring the characteristics and the effectiveness of drills in Estonian elementary schools. Sixteen characteristics of drills that had statistically significant correlation with student learning, and the influence of these characteristics are discussed as the results of this study. The results indicated that characteristics related to feedback, presentation of information and questions are the most critical evaluating quality of drills and in designing such educational software.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Hughes I. E., 1998, Information Services & Use, V18, P35
[12]  
Hughes L.E., 2000, Journal of Research in Reading, V23, P314, DOI [10.1111/1467-9817.00126, DOI 10.1111/1467-9817.00126]
[13]   Principles and practical grouping for the use of drill and practice programs [J].
Jackson, A ;
Kutnick, P ;
Kington, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2001, 17 (02) :130-141
[14]  
KLIMAN M, 1999, CHOOSING MATH GAME S
[15]  
LUIK P, 2004, EFFICIENT CHARACTERI
[16]   WHEN IS AN ILLUSTRATION WORTH 10000 WORDS [J].
MAYER, RE ;
GALLINI, JK .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 82 (04) :715-726
[17]  
McCoy L. P., 1996, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, V28, P438
[18]   Characteristics of multimedia textbooks that affect post-test scores [J].
Mikk, J ;
Luik, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2003, 19 (04) :528-537
[19]  
NAJJAR LJ, 2001, READING TRAINING SIM, P46
[20]  
Nathan R., 1995, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, V27, P348