Drive theory revisited

被引:10
作者
Peskin, MM
机构
[1] New York, NY 10028
关键词
D O I
10.1080/21674086.1997.11927538
中图分类号
B84-0 [心理学理论];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Fallacious energic formulations and phylogenetic oversimplifications have led drive theory into disfavor. However, the advantages of a drive concept based on evolutionary principles outweigh the disadvantages. A psychological drive concept best captures the innately endowed, self-enhancing motivational push compatible with evolutionary principles, while at the same time being consonant with the intrapsychic dynamics of psychoanalytic observation. Current evolutionary principles and their implications are discussed. Incorporating these principles as cogent theoretical postulates is a crucial part Of maintaining a link to the natural sciences and thereby to our involvement in the great enterprise of elaborating a comprehensive psychology. To exclude these concepts is to promote a detachment from our involvement in the natural sciences and to lose a powerful heuristic guide for our theoretical endeavors.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 402
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DID DARWIN GET IT RI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Oedipus and beyond: A Clinical Theory
[3]  
[Anonymous], SE
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL VERSUS METAP
[5]  
ARLOW JA, 1949, READINGS PSYCHOANALY, P197
[6]  
Brenner C, 1982, MIND CONFLICT
[7]   THE PUZZLE OF CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE [J].
CHALMERS, DJ .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1995, 273 (06) :80-86
[8]  
Damasio AR., 2005, Descartes' Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, VReprint
[9]  
Dawkins R., 1982, pi
[10]  
DAWKINS R, 1978, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V47, P61