The staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: Implications as an adjunctive procedure for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:17
作者
Alagiri, M [1 ]
Colton, MD [1 ]
Seidmon, EJ [1 ]
Greenberg, RE [1 ]
Hanno, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] TEMPLE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; nodal metastases; laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00233.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the utility of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and to identify factors associated with nodal metastases in which a node dissection would be of clinical benefit. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis (1989-1993) was performed on 303 consecutive patients who underwent staging bilateral modified pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate age, race, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score for predicting nodal metastases. Results Twenty-eight patients had nodal metastases, giving an overall prevalence of 9.2%. PSA and Gleason score (both P<0.001) were significantly predictive of nodal involvement when combined or as independent variables. Relative to PSA and Gleason score, the patients' age, race and clinical stage were less relevant. Sensitivity analysis determined that combining a PSA of greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL (normal 0-4) and a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8 gave a negative predictive value of 92% with a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value of 67% and an overall accuracy of 91% for predicting nodal metastases. Conclusion From this data, lymph node metastases are unlikely in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a PSA of < 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score <8, and that a pelvic lymph node dissection as an adjunctive procedure should be avoided in such individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 246
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] THE CONTEMPORARY INCIDENCE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION
    DANELLA, JF
    DEKERNION, JB
    SMITH, RB
    STECKEL, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (06) : 1488 - 1491
  • [2] INTRAOPERATIVE AND EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF STAGING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION IN PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA
    DONOHUE, RE
    MANI, JH
    WHITESEL, JA
    AUGSPURGER, RR
    WILLIAMS, G
    FAUVER, HE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [3] REEVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN LOW-GRADE PROSTATE-CANCER
    FOURNIER, GR
    NARAYAN, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 72 (04): : 484 - 488
  • [4] KAVOUSSI LR, 1993, J UROLOGY, V149, P322, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36069-X
  • [5] STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN TECHNIQUES
    KERBL, K
    CLAYMAN, RV
    PETROS, JA
    CHANDHOKE, PS
    GILL, IS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) : 396 - 398
  • [6] PROSTATIC CARCINOMA - INCIDENCE AND LOCATION OF UNSUSPECTED LYMPHATIC METASTASES
    MCLAUGHLIN, AP
    SALTZSTEIN, SL
    MCCULLOUGH, DL
    GITTES, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 115 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [7] THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARTIN, AW
    YOO, J
    CARTER, HB
    PEARSON, JD
    CHAN, DW
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) : 110 - 114
  • [8] LOWER INCIDENCE OF UNSUSPECTED LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN 521 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PETROS, JA
    CATALONA, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (06) : 1574 - 1575
  • [9] SMITH JA, 1983, J UROLOGY, V130, P290, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)51112-X
  • [10] *UN INT CONTR CANC, 1992, TNM CLASS MAL TUM