Comparison of biochemical methane potential and methanogen morphology of different organic solid wastes co-digested anaerobically with treatment plant sludge

被引:17
作者
Lawal-Akinlami, Helen Adetoun [1 ,2 ]
Palaniyandi, Shanmugam [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Cent Leather Res Inst, Environm Sci & Engn Div, Madras 600020, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Acad Sci & Innovat Res AcSIR, 2 Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110001, India
关键词
Organic solid wastes; Common effluent treatment plant sludge; Anaerobic digestion; Biochemical methane potential; Methanogens; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; BATCH; PERFORMANCE; FRACTION; ENHANCEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; INHIBITION; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes biomethanation of tannery limed fleshing (TLF), fruits and vegetables (FVW), and sugarcane juice residue (SJR) with pre-fermented tannery-based common effluent treatment plant sludge (CETP), as an inoculum. The BMP, microbial morphology and other bioprocess efficiency parameters were evaluated using a laboratory scale batch reactor, with a substrate/inoculum ratio of 3:1 under a mesophilic anaerobic (35 +/- 2 degrees C) condition and mixed at 100 rpm in orbit shaker. Maximum cumulative biogas yield was observed in FVW (2468.50 +/- 0.44 NmmL/d) followed by TLF and SJR comparatively to the inoculum. The specific methane yield observed ranged from 0.169 +/- 0.05 to 0.478 +/- 0.00 Nm L/gVS(r) for the wastes, against 0.2041 +/- 0.01 Nm L/gVS(r) for control treatment. The mixture of all the three wastes (CLFS) benefitted to yield more biogas compared to the mono-digestion. The highest VSr and sCODr efficiency of 62.44 +/- 0.32 and 93.46 +/- 1.04% obtained in FVW compared to other wastes, coincides with the methanogenic microbial count and densities. A good correlation (R-2 = 0.82) was also observed between the experimental BMP and stoichiometric methane potential of the various organic solid wastes. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes
    Alvarez, J. A.
    Otero, L.
    Lema, J. M.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (04) : 1153 - 1158
  • [2] Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays
    Angelidaki, I.
    Alves, M.
    Bolzonella, D.
    Borzacconi, L.
    Campos, J. L.
    Guwy, A. J.
    Kalyuzhnyi, S.
    Jenicek, P.
    van Lier, J. B.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) : 927 - 934
  • [3] Methanosaeta fibers in anaerobic migrating blanket reactors
    Angenent, LT
    Zheng, D
    Sung, S
    Raskin, L
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (4-5) : 35 - 39
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, STANDARD METHODS EXA, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.37-2792
  • [5] Basak S. R., 2014, Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, V49, P119
  • [6] Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition
    Bouallagui, H.
    Lahdheb, H.
    Ben Romdan, E.
    Rachdi, B.
    Hamdi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) : 1844 - 1849
  • [7] A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels
    Channiwala, SA
    Parikh, PP
    [J]. FUEL, 2002, 81 (08) : 1051 - 1063
  • [8] Anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste (SHW) at laboratory scale:: Influence of co-digestion with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW)
    Cuetos, Maria Jose
    Gomez, Xiomar
    Otero, Marta
    Moran, Antonio
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2008, 40 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [9] High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: Feasibility study
    Duan, Nina
    Dong, Bin
    Wu, Bing
    Dai, Xiaohu
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 104 : 150 - 156
  • [10] Anaerobic biotransformation and methane generation potential of cheese whey in batch and UASB reactors
    Ergüder, TH
    Tezel, U
    Güven, E
    Demirer, GN
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (07) : 643 - 650