Blood pressure patterns in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term

被引:21
作者
van der Tuuk, K. [1 ]
Tajik, P. [2 ,3 ]
Koopmans, C. M. [1 ]
van den Berg, P. P. [1 ]
Mol, B. W. J. [4 ]
van Pampus, M. G. [5 ]
Groen, H. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 30-001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Inst, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Blood pressure; Hypertension; Prediction; Preeclampsia; SOUTH-AUSTRALIA; HYPITAT TRIAL; RISK-FACTORS; PREGNANCY; PREDICTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Gestational hypertension (GH) and mild preeclampsia (PE) represent the most common medical complications of pregnancy, with the majority of cases developing at or near term. There is little knowledge of the course of blood pressure over time in these women. We explored the pattern of systolic and diastolic blood pressure over time in women with GH or mild PE at term participating in the HYPITAT trial, and we attempted to identify clinical factors influencing these blood pressure patterns and the impact of severe hypertension on clinical management. Study design: We used data from the HYPITAT trial, that included women with a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in cephalic position between 36 and 41 weeks of gestation with the diagnosis of GH or mild PE. Blood pressure measurements were performed from randomization or admission until delivery or discharge from the hospital. We included the highest blood pressure of each day. We evaluated systolic and diastolic blood pressure change over time, as well as the influence of clinical characteristics and laboratory findings on the course of blood pressure. We used univariate and multivariate regression analysis with a backward stepwise algorithm for the selection of variables. The model with the best fit (lowest AIC) was selected as the final model. We also compared mode of delivery for women with and without severe hypertension. Results: We studied 1076 women who had 4188 blood pressure measurements done. The systolic blood pressure showed a significant non-linear increase over time and for the diastolic blood pressure the pattern was also non-linear. In the multivariable model of systolic blood pressure change over time, nulliparity, ethnicity, systolic blood pressure (at baseline), BMI and LDH at randomization influenced the course of blood pressure. In the diastolic blood pressure model ALT and the baseline diastolic blood pressure had a significant influence. When we explored the association between blood pressure and mode of delivery, it appeared that development of severe hypertension was a risk factor for Caesarean section. Conclusion: The blood pressure in patients with GH or PE at term showed a non-linear increase with time, which was aggravated by clinical characteristics. Development of severe hypertension was a risk factor for Caesarean section, which may explain the elevated Caesarean section rates in the expectant monitoring group in the HYPITAT trial. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 365
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Blood pressure variability during gestation in healthy and complicated pregnancies [J].
Ayala, DE ;
Hermida, RC ;
Mojon, A ;
Fernandez, JR ;
Silva, I ;
Ucieda, R ;
Iglesias, M .
HYPERTENSION, 1997, 30 (03) :611-618
[2]   Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Early Identification of Hypertension in Pregnancy [J].
Ayala, Diana E. ;
Hermida, Ramon C. .
CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 30 (1-2) :233-259
[3]   Hypertension in pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes according to laboratory and clinical features [J].
Brown, MA ;
Buddle, ML .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 165 (07) :360-365
[4]   Blood pressure patterns in normal pregnancy, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia [J].
Hermida, RC ;
Ayala, DE ;
Mojón, A ;
Fernández, JR ;
Alonso, I ;
Silva, I ;
Ucieda, R ;
Iglesias, M .
HYPERTENSION, 2000, 36 (02) :149-158
[5]   Risk factors for hypertension during pregnancy in South Australia [J].
Jacobs, DJ ;
Vreeburg, SA ;
Dekker, GA ;
Heard, AR ;
Priest, KR ;
Chan, A .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :421-428
[6]   Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial [J].
Koopmans, Corine M. ;
Bijlenga, Denise ;
Groen, Henk ;
Vijgen, Sylvia M. C. ;
Aarnoudse, Jan G. ;
Bekedam, Dick J. ;
van den Berg, Paul P. ;
de Boer, Karin ;
Burggraaff, Jan M. ;
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. ;
Drogtrop, Addy P. ;
Franx, Arie ;
de Groot, Christianne J. M. ;
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. ;
Kwee, Anneke ;
van Loon, Aren J. ;
Lub, Annemiek ;
Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. ;
van der Post, Joris A. M. ;
Roumen, Frans J. M. E. ;
Scheepers, Hubertina C. J. ;
Willekes, Christine ;
Mol, Ben W. J. ;
van Pampus, Maria G. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9694) :979-988
[7]   The CHIPS Randomized Controlled Trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study): Is Severe Hypertension Just an Elevated Blood Pressure? [J].
Magee, Laura A. ;
von Dadelszen, Peter ;
Singer, Joel ;
Lee, Terry ;
Rey, Evelyne ;
Ross, Susan ;
Asztalos, Elizabeth ;
Murphy, Kellie E. ;
Menzies, Jennifer ;
Sanchez, Johanna ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Helewa, Michael ;
Hutton, Eileen ;
Koren, Gideon ;
Lee, Shoo K. ;
Logan, Alexander G. ;
Ganzevoort, Wessel ;
Welch, Ross ;
Thornton, Jim G. ;
Moutquin, Jean-Marie .
HYPERTENSION, 2016, 68 (05) :1153-1159
[8]   Early risk assessment of severe preeclampsia: Admission battery of symptoms and laboratory tests to predict likelihood of subsequent significant maternal morbidity [J].
Martin, JN ;
May, WL ;
Magann, EF ;
Terrone, DA ;
Rinehart, BK ;
Blake, PG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (06) :1407-1412
[9]   Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial [J].
Tajik, P. ;
van der Tuuk, K. ;
Koopmans, C. M. ;
Groen, H. ;
van Pampus, M. G. ;
van der Berg, P. P. ;
van der Post, J. A. ;
van Loon, A. J. ;
de Groot, C. J. M. ;
Kwee, A. ;
Huisjes, A. J. M. ;
van Beek, E. ;
Papatsonis, D. N. M. ;
Bloemenkamp, K. W. ;
van Unnik, G. A. ;
Porath, M. ;
Rijnders, R. J. ;
Stigter, R. H. ;
de Boer, K. ;
Scheepers, H. C. ;
Zwinderman, A. H. ;
Bossuyt, P. M. ;
Mol, B. W. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (09) :1123-1130
[10]   Prioritisation of tests for the prediction of preeclampsia complications: A Delphi survey [J].
Thangaratinam, S. ;
Ismail, K. ;
Sharp, S. ;
Coomarasamy, A. ;
O'Mahony, F. ;
Khan, K. S. ;
O'Brien, S. .
HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2007, 26 (01) :131-138