Changes in the Availability of Screening Mammography, 2000-2010

被引:10
作者
Elkin, Elena B. [1 ]
Atoria, Coral L. [1 ]
Leoce, Nicole [2 ]
Bach, Peter B. [1 ]
Schrag, Deborah [3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Ctr Hlth Policy & Outcomes, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Ctr Outcomes & Policy Res, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
breast cancer; screening; mammography; access; disparities; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; BREAST-CANCER SURVIVORS; UNITED-STATES; ACCESS; POPULATION; CAPACITY; TIMES; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28305
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRates of screening mammography have plateaued, and the number of mammography facilities has declined in the past decade. The objective of this study was to assess changes over time and geographic disparities in the availability of mammography services. METHODSUsing information from the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Census, county-level mammography capacity was defined as the number of mammography machines per 10,000 women aged40 years. Cross-sectional variation and longitudinal changes in capacity were examined in relation to county characteristics. RESULTSBetween 2000 and 2010, the number of mammography facilities declined 10% from 9434 to 8469, the number of mammography machines declined 10% from 13,100 to 11,762, and the median county mammography capacity decreased nearly 20% from 1.77 to 1.42 machines per 10,000 women aged40 years. In cross-sectional analysis, counties with greater percentages of uninsured residents, less educated residents, greater population density, and higher managed care penetration had lower mammography capacity. Conversely, counties with more hospital beds per 100,000 population had higher capacity. High initial mammography capacity, growth in both the percentage of the population aged65 years and the percentage living in poverty, and increased managed care penetration were all associated with a decrease in mammography capacity between 2000 and 2010. Only the percentage of rural residents was associated with an increase in capacity. CONCLUSIONSGeographic variation in mammography capacity and declines in capacity over time are associated with demographic, socioeconomic, and health care market characteristics. Maldistribution of mammography resources may explain geographic disparities in breast cancer screening rates. Cancer 2013;119:3847-3853. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3847 / 3853
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Allen SS, 2011, J FAM PRACTICE, V60, P524
  • [2] The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer
    Andersen, MR
    Urban, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (11) : 1713 - 1715
  • [3] [Anonymous], HLTH PEOPL 2020
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [5] The Future of Mammography: Radiology Residents' Experiences, Attitudes, and Opinions
    Baxi, Shrujal S.
    Snow, Jacqueline G.
    Liberman, Laura
    Elkin, Elena B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) : 1680 - 1686
  • [6] Digital and screen-film mammography: Comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Solari, M
    Barke, L
    Reddy, D
    Wolfman, J
    Segal, L
    DeLeon, P
    Benjamin, S
    Willis, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (01) : 38 - 41
  • [7] Reported drop in mammography - Is this cause for concern?
    Breen, Nancy
    Cronin, Kathleen A.
    Meissner, Helen I.
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Tangka, Florence K.
    Tiro, Jasmin A.
    McNeel, Timothy S.
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (12) : 2405 - 2409
  • [8] Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Calonge, Ned
    Petitti, Diana B.
    DeWitt, Thomas G.
    Dietrich, Allen J.
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    Grossman, David
    Isham, George
    LeFevre, Michael L.
    Leipzig, Rosanne M.
    Marion, Lucy N.
    Melnyk, Bernadette
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    Ockene, Judith K.
    Sawaya, George F.
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Wilt, Timothy
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (10) : 716 - W236
  • [9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2007, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V56, P49
  • [10] Changes in access to screening mammography, 2008-2011
    Elkin, Elena B.
    Nobles, J. Paige
    Pinheiro, Laura C.
    Atoria, Coral L.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (05) : 1057 - 1059