Using Deep Learning Algorithms for Intermittent Streamflow Prediction in the Headwaters of the Colorado River, Texas

被引:15
作者
Forghanparast, Farhang [1 ]
Mohammadi, Ghazal [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
LSTM; CNN; ELM; temporary rivers; hydrological extremes; TEMPORARY RIVER; NASH-SUTCLIFFE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODEL; MACHINE; NETWORKS; SERIES; BASIN; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/w14192972
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predicting streamflow in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES), particularly those in climate hotspots such as the headwaters of the Colorado River in Texas, is a necessity for all planning and management endeavors associated with these ubiquitous and valuable surface water resources. In this study, the performance of three deep learning algorithms, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Self-Attention LSTM models, were evaluated and compared against a baseline Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) model for monthly streamflow prediction in the headwaters of the Texas Colorado River. The predictive performance of the models was assessed over the entire range of flow as well as for capturing the extreme hydrologic events (no-flow events and extreme floods) using a suite of model evaluation metrics. According to the results, the deep learning algorithms, especially the LSTM-based models, outperformed the ELM with respect to all evaluation metrics and offered overall higher accuracy and better stability (more robustness against overfitting). Unlike its deep learning counterparts, the simpler ELM model struggled to capture important components of the IRES flow time-series and failed to offer accurate estimates of the hydrologic extremes. The LSTM model (K.G.E. > 0.7, R-2 > 0.75, and r > 0.85), with better evaluation metrics than the ELM and CNN algorithm, and competitive performance to the SA-LSTM model, was identified as an appropriate, effective, and parsimonious streamflow prediction tool for the headwaters of the Colorado River in Texas.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [1] Assessing machine learning models for streamflow estimation: a case study in Oued Sebaou watershed (Northern Algeria)
    Abda, Zaki
    Zerouali, Bilel
    Chettih, Mohamed
    Guimaraes Santos, Celso Augusto
    Simoes de Farias, Camilo Allyson
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2022, 67 (09) : 1328 - 1341
  • [2] Aksoy H, 2000, HYDROL PROCESS, V14, P1725, DOI 10.1002/1099-1085(200007)14:10<1725::AID-HYP108>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-L
  • [4] A global streamflow reanalysis for 1980-2018
    Alfieri, Lorenzo
    Lorini, Valerio
    Hirpa, Feyera A.
    Harrigan, Shaun
    Zsoter, Ervin
    Prudhomme, Christel
    Salamon, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY X, 2020, 6
  • [5] A novel attention-based LSTM cell post-processor coupled with bayesian optimization for streamflow prediction
    Alizadeh, Babak
    Bafti, Alireza Ghaderi
    Kamangir, Hamid
    Zhang, Yu
    Wright, Daniel B.
    Franz, Kristie J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 601
  • [6] [Anonymous], PRISM CLIMATE GROUP
  • [7] Comparative Analysis of Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting
    Apaydin, Halit
    Feizi, Hajar
    Sattari, Mohammad Taghi
    Colak, Muslume Sevba
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Chau, Kwok-Wing
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [8] Reduction of Overfitting in Diabetes Prediction Using Deep Learning Neural Network
    Ashiquzzaman, Akm
    Tushar, Abdul Kawsar
    Islam, Md. Rashedul
    Shon, Dongkoo
    Im, Kichang
    Park, Jeong-Ho
    Lim, Dong-Sun
    Kim, Jongmyon
    [J]. IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 1, 2018, 449 : 35 - 43
  • [9] The correlation coefficient:: An overview
    Asuero, AG
    Sayago, A
    González, AG
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 36 (01) : 41 - 59
  • [10] Prediction of hydrological time-series using extreme learning machine
    Atiquzzaman, Md
    Kandasamy, Jaya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2016, 18 (02) : 345 - 353