Induction of morphological deformities and moulting alterations in Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles exposed to the triazole-derivative fungicide tilt

被引:19
作者
Betancourt-Lozano, M
Baird, DJ
Sangha, RS
González-Farias, F
机构
[1] CIAD Mazatlan, Ctr Invest Alimentac & Desarrollo, Mazatlan Unit Aquaculture & Environm Management, Mazatlan 82010, Sinaloa, Mexico
[2] Univ Stirling, Inst Aquaculture, Environm Grp, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Univ New Brunswick, Canadian Rivers Inst, NWRI Environm Canada, Fredericton, NB, Canada
[4] Natl Autonomous Univ Mexico, Fac Engn, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00244-005-0149-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A tropical marine bioassay was developed with juveniles of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in order to test the acute and sublethal toxicity of Tilt, which is the commercial formulation of the fungicide propiconazole. A 10-d acute toxicity and a 32-d sublethal test were performed. A median lethal concentration (LC50) was determined for different exposure times, resulting in a 24-h LC50 of 1167 (1101-1386) mu g/L (concentration based on active ingredient propiconazole), and reaching a threshold LC50 (72-h) at 1043 (1018-1068) mu g/L. The sublethal exposure test was performed with propiconazole concentrations ranging from 367 to 825 mu g/L. Animals in most treatments showed a significant increase in intermoult duration compared to those in the control treatment, although this did not seem to be concentration-dependent. However, the shrimps exposed to the sublethal concentrations of this fungicide showed morphological deformities, with a significant positive relationship between concentration and deformities of the rostrum, paraeopods, and uropods. Altogether, the results presented indicate the potential effects of Tilt on shrimp, particularly under long-term exposures, although these were found to occur at concentrations exceeding those reported in natural environments.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 78
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]  
DEVINE DV, 1982, BIOL BULL, V163, P44
[22]  
Drewa G, 1988, KIELER MEERESFORSCH, V6, P454
[23]  
ESCOBAR GJ, 1984, P 1 INT C CULT PEN P, P23
[24]  
FARR JA, 1978, T AM FISH SOC, V107, P87, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1978)107<87:TEOMPO>2.0.CO
[25]  
2
[26]  
FORBES VE, 1996, ECOTOXICOLOGY ECOLOG, P72
[27]  
Hartley D., 1987, AGROCHEMICAL HDB
[28]  
Hassall KA, 1990, BIOCH USES PESTICIDE, DOI [10.1007/978-1-349-20990-3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-20990-3]
[29]   Responses of crustaceans to contaminant exposure: A holistic approach [J].
Hebel, DK ;
Jones, MB ;
Depledge, MH .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 1997, 44 (02) :177-184
[30]  
Hewlett P.S, 1979, INTRO INTERPRETATION