Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting

被引:259
作者
Game, Edward T. [1 ]
Kareiva, Peter [2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nature Conservancy, Conservat Sci, West End, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Nature Conservancy, Conservat Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Conservation Action Planning; conservation planning; decision science; measurement theory; operations research; prioritization; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; DECISIONS; SELECTION; RESERVES; SCIENCE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12051
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors' intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources allocated. Drawing on well-established principles of decision science, we highlight 6 mistakes commonly associated with setting priorities for conservation: not acknowledging conservation plans are prioritizations; trying to solve an ill-defined problem; not prioritizing actions; arbitrariness; hidden value judgments; and not acknowledging risk of failure. We explain these mistakes and offer a path to help conservation planners avoid making the same mistakes in future prioritizations.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 485
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511598951.003
[3]   Global biodiversity conservation priorities [J].
Brooks, T. M. ;
Mittermeier, R. A. ;
da Fonseca, G. A. B. ;
Gerlach, J. ;
Hoffmann, M. ;
Lamoreux, J. F. ;
Mittermeier, C. G. ;
Pilgrim, J. D. ;
Rodrigues, A. S. L. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5783) :58-61
[4]  
Burgman M., 2005, Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management
[5]   Prioritizing threat management for biodiversity conservation [J].
Carwardine, Josie ;
O'Connor, Trudy ;
Legge, Sarah ;
Mackey, Brendan ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Martin, Tara G. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (03) :196-204
[6]  
Edwards W., 1990, INSIGHTS DECISION MA, P44
[7]   Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy [J].
Failing, L ;
Gregory, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 68 (02) :121-132
[8]   Planning for persistence in marine reserves: A question of catastrophic importance [J].
Game, Edward T. ;
Watts, Matthew E. ;
Wooldridge, Scott ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 18 (03) :670-680
[9]   Incorporating climate change adaptation into national conservation assessments [J].
Game, Edward T. ;
Lipsett-Moore, Geoffrey ;
Saxon, Earl ;
Peterson, Nate ;
Sheppard, Stuart .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (10) :3150-3160
[10]   Should We Protect the Strong or the Weak? Risk, Resilience, and the Selection of Marine Protected Areas [J].
Game, Edward T. ;
Mcdonald-Madden, Eve ;
Puotinen, Marji L. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) :1619-1629