Vertebral Bone Quality Score and Postoperative Lumbar Lordosis Associated with Need for Reoperation After Lumbar Fusion

被引:52
作者
Ehresman, Jeff [1 ]
Ahmed, A. Karim [1 ]
Lubelski, Daniel [1 ]
Schilling, Andrew [1 ]
Pennington, Zach [1 ]
Cottrill, Ethan [1 ]
McCracken, Julie [1 ]
Khan, Majid [2 ]
Witham, Timothy [1 ]
Sciubba, Daniel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Hardware failure; Osteoporosis; Reoperation; Spine fusion; Vertebral bone quality; ADJACENT-SEGMENT DISEASE; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.020
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Poor bone quality is a known risk factor for hardware failure and adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. One new method of analyzing bone quality is the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, which can be obtained from preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We decided to evaluate whether patients' VBQ scores were associated with reoperation after lumbar fusion. METHODS: We queried records of patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions between 2012 and 2017. Patients who required reoperations after lumbar fusions because of symptomatic hardware failure or adjacent segment disease were combined into a case group and compared with a matched control group. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients who underwent elective lumbar fusions and required reoperation, 30 met the inclusion criteria. A 2:1 control group of 60 individually age-, body mass indexe, and sex-matched patients who did not require reoperation was then created. The reoperation group had significantly lower degrees of postoperative lumbar lordosis. There were no significant differences regarding other spinopelvic parameters, adjacent Pfirrmann scores, or dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T scores. There was, however, a significant difference in VBQ scores between the groups, with the reoperation group having a higher VBQ score. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that bone quality, according to the VBQ score rather than the DXA T score, is an important risk factor for reoperation after lumbar fusion surgery. Therefore, this MRI-based tool may be used to assist surgeons in preoperative planning for spine surgeries with the goal of reducing the risk of requiring reoperation.
引用
收藏
页码:E247 / E252
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NEUROSURGERY, DOI DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000627
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, J NEUROSURG SPINE, DOI DOI 10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19954
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NEUROSURGERY, DOI DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000627
[4]   Incidence of Osteoporosis-Related Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion [J].
Bjerke, Benjamin T. ;
Zarrabian, Mohammad ;
Aleem, Ilyas S. ;
Fogelson, Jeremy L. ;
Currier, Bradford L. ;
Freedman, Brett A. ;
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Nassr, Ahmad .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (06) :563-569
[5]   MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture [J].
Chang, Gregory ;
Boone, Sean ;
Martel, Dimitri ;
Rajapakse, Chamith S. ;
Hallyburton, Robert S. ;
Valko, Mitch ;
Honig, Stephen ;
Regatte, Ravinder R. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (02) :323-337
[6]  
Choe Han Seong, 2016, J Phys Ther Sci, V28, P1928, DOI 10.1589/jpts.28.1928
[7]   Survey of spine surgeons on attitudes regarding osteoporosis and osteomalacia screening and treatment for fractures, fusion surgery, and pseudoarthrosis [J].
Dipaola, Christian P. ;
Bible, Jesse E. ;
Biswas, Debdut ;
Dipaola, Matthew ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. ;
Rechtine, Glenn R. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (07) :537-544
[8]   Novel MRI-based score for assessment of bone density in operative spine patients [J].
Ehresman, Jeff ;
Pennington, Zach ;
Schilling, Andrew ;
Lubelski, Daniel ;
Ahmed, A. Karim ;
Cottrill, Ethan ;
Khan, Majid ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (04) :556-562
[9]  
Epstein Nancy E, 2015, Surg Neurol Int, V6, pS591, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.170432
[10]   Treatment of osteopenia [J].
Eriksen, Erik Fink .
REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2012, 13 (03) :209-223