SUPERCRITICAL WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR REACTORS (SCWRs): CURRENT AND FUTURE CONCEPTS - STEAM CYCLE OPTIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Duffey, R. B. [1 ]
Pioro, I.
Zhou, X.
Zirn, U.
Kuran, S.
Khartabil, H. [1 ]
Naidin, M.
机构
[1] Atom Energy Canada Ltd, Chalk River Labs, Chalk River, ON K0J 1J0, Canada
来源
ICONE 16: PROCEEDING OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2008, VOL 4 | 2008年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
One of the six Generation IV nuclear reactor concepts is a SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR), which is currently under development. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are to increase the thermal efficiency of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), to decrease electrical energy costs, and possibility for co-generation, including hydrogen generation. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and Research and Development Institute of Power Engineering (RDIPE or NIKIET in Russian abbreviations) are currently developing pressure-tube SCWR concepts. The targeted steam parameters at the reactor outlet are approximately 25 MPa and 625 degrees C. This paper presents a survey on modem SuperCritical (SC) steam turbine technology and a study on potential steam cycles for the SCWR plants. The survey reveals that by the time the Gen IV SCWRs are market-ready, the required steam turbine technology will be well proven. Three potential steam cycles in an SCWR plant are presented: a dual-cycle with steam reheat, a direct cycle with steam reheat, and a direct cycle with a Moisture Separator and Reheater (MSR). System thermal-performance simulations have been performed to determine the overall cycle efficiency of the proposed cycles. The results show that the direct cycle with steam reheat has the highest efficiency. The direct cycle with MSR is an alternative option, which will simplify the reactor design at the penalty of a slightly lower cycle efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 477
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE FAILURES - OPERATING EXPERIENCES IN WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS IN 1977
    NOVAKOVA, H
    JADERNA ENERGIE, 1981, 27 (8-9): : 334 - 338
  • [42] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE PERFORMANCE - EXPERIENCE WITH WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS DURING 1982
    TATONE, OS
    PATHANIA, RS
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1985, 26 (05): : 623 - 640
  • [43] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE FAILURES - WORLD EXPERIENCE IN WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS IN 1976
    TATONE, OS
    PATHANIA, RS
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1978, 19 (06): : 748 - 760
  • [44] Robust Control of Once-Through Canadian Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactors
    Sun, Peiwei
    Feng, Ji
    Yuan, Xianbao
    Zhao, Liang
    Liu, Furong
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 199 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [45] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE PERFORMANCE - EXPERIENCE WITH WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS DURING 1985
    TATONE, OS
    TAPPING, RL
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1989, 30 (03): : 382 - 399
  • [46] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE PERFORMANCE - EXPERIENCE WITH WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS DURING 1981
    TATONE, OS
    PATHANIA, RS
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1984, 25 (03): : 373 - 398
  • [47] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE FAILURES - WORLD EXPERIENCE IN WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS IN 1973
    STEVENSGUILLE, PD
    HARE, MG
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1975, 16 (05): : 603 - 614
  • [48] Nuclear fuel for water-cooled power reactors. Status and prospects
    Konovalov, VF
    Molchanov, VL
    Solonin, MI
    Bibilashvili, YK
    Tsykanov, VA
    ATOMIC ENERGY, 2000, 89 (04) : 843 - 852
  • [49] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE FAILURES - WORLD EXPERIENCE IN WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS IN 1974
    HARE, MG
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1976, 17 (02): : 231 - 242
  • [50] STEAM-GENERATOR TUBE PERFORMANCE - EXPERIENCE WITH WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR-POWER REACTORS DURING 1980
    TATONE, OS
    PATHANIA, RS
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1983, 24 (01): : 75 - 97