Comparative Effects of Supplemental DL-2-hydroxy-4-[methylthio] Butanoic Acid and DL-methionine in Diet on Egg Production and Quality in Laying Hens

被引:8
作者
Bunchasak, Chaiyapoom [1 ]
Ratchadapornvanitch, Yanisa [1 ]
Thiengtham, Jamroen [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
egg production; egg quality; egg shell; hens; methionine; ANALOG-FREE ACID; EGGSHELL QUALITY; BROILER-CHICKENS; COMPONENT YIELD; LOW-PROTEIN; PERFORMANCE; SHELL; BIOAVAILABILITY; WEIGHT; BROWN;
D O I
10.2141/jpsa.011081
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to compare the effects of DL-2-hydroxy-4-[methylthio] butanoic acid (HMB) and DL-methionine (DLM) on egg production performance and egg quality of laying hens. Two hundred and eighty-eight commercial laying hens were assigned to 3 dietary treatment groups and fed the experimental diets from 34 to 46 weeks of age. The bioefficacy of HMB relative to DL-methionine (DLM) was set at 88% (weight/weight), therefore 0.115% of HMB and 0.101% of DLM were added to a basal diet. DLM and HMB supplementation increased body weight, feed intake, hen-day egg production, egg weight, FCR and egg mass (P<0.01). These supplementations also increased yolk and albumen weight (g/egg) (P<0.01), while DLM slightly decreased albumen weight (% of egg). Consequently, Haugh unit was poor by DLM supplementation but did not by HMB supplementation (P<0.05). DLM supplementation significantly increased fat content in egg (g/egg and % of egg), though level of estradiol in blood was elevated by HMB supplementation. In conclusion, HMB supplementation (as 88% bioefficacy of DLM) can be used as an effective methionine source. However, mechanism of protein and fat synthesis and/or degradation of laying hens may be differed when different form of methionine is supplied.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   EFFECT OF ESTROGEN IMPLANTS ON HEPATIC LIPID DEPOSITION IN CHICKS FED DIFFERENT ISONITROGENOUS AND ISOCALORIC DIETS [J].
AKIBA, Y ;
JENSEN, LS ;
LILBURN, MS .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1982, 112 (01) :189-196
[2]  
Aletor VA, 2000, J SCI FOOD AGR, V80, P547, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(200004)80:5<547::AID-JSFA531>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-C, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(200004)80:5<547::AID-JSFA531>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-3]
[5]  
Anderson K, 2004, WORLD'S WINE MARKETS, P3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, OFFICIAL METHODS ANA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PRINCIPLES PROCEDURE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, HY LINE VARIETY W 77, P1996
[9]  
BERTRAM HL, 1995, ARCH GEFLUGELKD, V59, P103
[10]  
Bunchasak C., 2005, International Journal of Poultry Science, V4, P301