A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education

被引:73
作者
Al-Samarraie, Hosam [1 ]
Hurmuzan, Shuhaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Ctr Instruct Technol & Multimedia, George Town, Malaysia
关键词
Brainstorming; Higher education; Group discussion; Idea generation; Creativity; IDEA-GENERATION; CREATIVITY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; RULES; COMMUNICATION; INSTRUCTIONS; GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Various Brainstorming (BS) techniques have been proposed specifically to develop individuals' creativity and productivity during idea-generation sessions. Yet, the available knowledge about the potential of certain BS techniques seem very limited in higher education. Thus, a review of previous studies on some BS types such as the traditional brainstorming (TBS), nominal brainstorming (NBS), and electronic brainstorming (EBS) was conducted. A total of 42 well-grounded studies about the use of these techniques in a university context were reviewed. The classification of these studies was based on four key schemes related to the purpose of use, opportunities, challenges, and proposed solutions in a discipline-specific context. The review results revealed a set of evidences supporting the use of TBS, NBS, and EBS in specific areas. We also provided a comprehensive view of why certain interventions can be more effective in some contexts than others. The insights gained from this review can be used to guide educational decision makers to identify the best BS practices/conditions within a university setting. It also shed light on the potential opportunities and challenges that students may experience when using certain BS rules and techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 91
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques [J].
Aiken, M ;
Vanjani, M ;
Paolillo, J .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (02) :91-99
[2]  
Al-khatib B.A., 2012, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, V2, P29
[3]   Communicating a Key Benefit Claim Creatively and Effectively through Five Conveyor Properties [J].
Althuizen, Niek .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2017, 34 (01) :5-18
[4]  
Amoush K. H., 2015, Journal ofEducation and Practice, V6, P88
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, P 30 HAW INT C SYST
[6]   Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning [J].
Ardaiz-Villanueva, Oscar ;
Nicuesa-Chacon, Xabier ;
Brene-Artazcoz, Oscar ;
de Acedo Lizarraga, Maria Luisa Sanz ;
de Acedo Baquedano, Maria Teresa Sanz .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 56 (03) :700-711
[7]   Small group brainstorming and idea quality - Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? [J].
Barki, H ;
Pinsonneault, A .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2001, 32 (02) :158-205
[8]   The Role of Time and Category Relatedness in Electronic Brainstorming [J].
Baruah, Jonali ;
Paulus, Paul B. .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (03) :333-342
[9]   Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: An empirical evaluation [J].
Benbasat, I ;
Lim, J .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 83 (01) :167-183
[10]  
Brandies A., 2016, SWISS INTER AND TRAN