Impact of cultivation management in an agroecosystem on hot spot effects of earthworm middens

被引:23
作者
Schrader, S [1 ]
Seibel, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Braunschweig, Inst Zool, D-38092 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
agricultural management; Collembola; earthworm middens; Enchytraeidae; soil mites; soil protozoa;
D O I
10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01102-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In comparison to the surrounding soil, hot spot effects of middens of the epianecic earthworm Lumbricus terrestris were determined under different field conditions on a loamy sand. The impact of 3 different management systems was studied: 1. unmulched; 2. straw mulching; 3. intermediate crop: Sinapis alba. Furthermore, we considered 2 different crops (bean, lupine) and their growth stages. We monitored different enzyme activities and abiotic parameters of soil at 6 sampling dates between April and August 1998 parallel to abundances of microfauna (soil protozoa) and mesofauna (Enchytraeidae, Collembola, mites). The analysis of earthworm middens revealed enhanced enzyme activities and increased mesofaunal abundances. Differences between midden and reference samples were significant during the whole vegetation period and became maximal during ripening of crops. We found a distinct but not significant increase in individual numbers of soil flagellates in midden areas during leafing and heading of crops. Values of the studied parameters tended to be higher in bean plots but generally the crop impact on midden properties was not significant. Our results showed a significant positive synergistic effect between earthworm middens and intermediate crop. Straw mulching supported the hot spot effects of middens. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Benckiser, 1997, FAUNA SOIL ECOSYSTEM, P123
[2]   HOW DO EARTHWORMS AFFECT MICROFLORAL AND FAUNAL COMMUNITY DIVERSITY [J].
BROWN, GG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1995, 170 (01) :209-231
[3]   Influence of mulch and soil compaction on earthworm cast properties [J].
Buck, C ;
Langmaack, M ;
Schrader, S .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :223-229
[4]  
DARBYSHIRE JF, 1974, REV ECOL BIOL SOL, V11, P465
[5]   NOTES ON PROTOZOA IN AGRICULTURAL SOIL WITH EMPHASIS ON HETEROTROPHIC FLAGELLATES AND NAKED AMEBAS AND THEIR ECOLOGY [J].
EKELUND, F ;
RONN, R .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1994, 15 (04) :321-353
[6]   Soil protozoa as bioindicators: pros and cons, methods, diversity, representative examples [J].
Foissner, W .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) :95-112
[7]  
GRAEFE U, 1984, EINFACHE METHODE EXT, P17
[8]  
GRAFF O, 1969, PEDOBIOLOGIA, V9, P120
[9]  
Malkomes H.P., 1993, NACHRICHTENBL DEUT P, V45, P180
[10]  
Maraun M, 1999, PEDOBIOLOGIA, V43, P276