Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study

被引:46
作者
Baqain, Z. H. [1 ]
Al-Shafii, A. [1 ]
Hamdan, A. A. [1 ]
Sawair, F. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Dent, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Third molars; Flap design; Morbidity; SURGICAL REMOVAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two commonly used flap designs (envelope and triangular) used for the removal of mandibular third molars (M3) on postoperative morbidity. 19 patients with bilateral symmetrically impacted mandibular M3 were studied using a split mouth design. Swelling, pain and trismus measures were recorded on days 2, 7 and 14; periodontal indices were recorded on days 7 and 14, one final measure of probing depth on the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar (M2) was taken at the last follow up appointment. Data were analysed using the chi(2) test, the Mann Whitney U-test and Pearson's correlations. The mean age of the patients was 21.4 +/- 2.3 years (+/- SD). Facial swelling and the reduction in mouth opening were significantly greater in the early postoperative period (P < 0.05) with pyramidal flap designs. There was no significant difference in pain scores, plaque accumulation and bleeding on probing indices between the two flap designs (P > 0.05). Probing depth was significantly greater with envelope flaps in the early postoperative period (P < 0.005). In conclusion, flap design in mandibular M3 surgery has an effect on postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1024
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Preventing periodontal pocket formation after removal of an impacted mandibular third molar
    Motamedi, MHK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 130 (10) : 1482 - 1484
  • [12] Comma incision for impacted mandibular third molars
    Nageshwar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (12) : 1506 - 1509
  • [13] Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction
    Peng, KY
    Tseng, YC
    Shen, EC
    Chiu, SC
    Fu, E
    Huang, YW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (12) : 1647 - 1651
  • [14] Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery
    Renton, T
    Smeeton, N
    McGurk, M
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 190 (11) : 607 - 610
  • [15] Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars
    Sandhu, A.
    Sandhu, S.
    Kaur, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (11) : 1091 - 1096
  • [16] SURGICAL REMOVAL OF 3RD MOLARS
    SHEPHERD, JP
    BRICKLEY, M
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6955) : 620 - 621
  • [17] SILNESS J, 1964, Acta Odontol Scand, V22, P121, DOI 10.3109/00016356408993968
  • [18] Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: A prospective study
    Suarez-Cunqueiro, MM
    Gutwald, R
    Reichman, J
    Otero-Cepeda, XL
    Schmelzeisen, R
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2003, 95 (04): : 403 - 408
  • [19] Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables
    Yuasa, H
    Sugiura, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 42 (03) : 209 - 214