Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study

被引:46
作者
Baqain, Z. H. [1 ]
Al-Shafii, A. [1 ]
Hamdan, A. A. [1 ]
Sawair, F. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Dent, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Third molars; Flap design; Morbidity; SURGICAL REMOVAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two commonly used flap designs (envelope and triangular) used for the removal of mandibular third molars (M3) on postoperative morbidity. 19 patients with bilateral symmetrically impacted mandibular M3 were studied using a split mouth design. Swelling, pain and trismus measures were recorded on days 2, 7 and 14; periodontal indices were recorded on days 7 and 14, one final measure of probing depth on the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar (M2) was taken at the last follow up appointment. Data were analysed using the chi(2) test, the Mann Whitney U-test and Pearson's correlations. The mean age of the patients was 21.4 +/- 2.3 years (+/- SD). Facial swelling and the reduction in mouth opening were significantly greater in the early postoperative period (P < 0.05) with pyramidal flap designs. There was no significant difference in pain scores, plaque accumulation and bleeding on probing indices between the two flap designs (P > 0.05). Probing depth was significantly greater with envelope flaps in the early postoperative period (P < 0.005). In conclusion, flap design in mandibular M3 surgery has an effect on postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1024
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Frequency Estimates and Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity After Third Molar Removal: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Baqain, Zaid H.
    Abu Karaky, Ashraf
    Sawair, Faleh
    Khaisat, Ameen
    Duaibis, Ramzi
    Rajab, Lamis D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (11) : 2276 - 2283
  • [2] Briguglio F, 2011, QUINTESSENCE INT, V42, P445
  • [3] Chaves A J P, 2008, Int J Dent Hyg, V6, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00297.x
  • [4] Dhanrajani P J, 2002, Dent Update, V29, P88
  • [5] Erdogan O, 2011, ORAL MAXILLOFAC SURG
  • [6] Gabka J, 1971, MUNCHEN MED WOCHEN, V13, P198
  • [7] Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: Evaluation of 2 different flap designs
    Jakse, N
    Bankaoglu, V
    Wimmer, G
    Eskici, A
    Pertl, C
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2002, 93 (01): : 7 - 12
  • [8] Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery
    Kirk, D. Glenn
    Liston, Peter N.
    Tong, Darryl C.
    Love, Robert M.
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2007, 104 (01): : E1 - E6
  • [9] Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions
    Kirtiloglu, Tugrul
    Bulut, Emel
    Suemer, Mahinut
    Cengiz, Inanc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (11) : 2206 - 2210
  • [10] 3RD MOLAR SURGERY - AN AUDIT OF THE INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLAINTS AND PATIENT SATISFACTION
    LOPES, V
    MUMENYA, R
    FEINMANN, C
    HARRIS, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 33 (01) : 33 - 35