Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review

被引:168
|
作者
Rushforth, Bruno [1 ]
McCrorie, Carolyn [2 ]
Glidewell, Liz [2 ]
Midgley, Eleanor [2 ]
Foy, Robbie [3 ]
机构
[1] Foundry Lane Surg, 95 Moresdale Lane, Leeds LS14 6GG, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Primary Care, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
diabetes mellitus; type; 2; primary health care; qualitative research; quality improvement; systematic review; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INITIATING INSULIN THERAPY; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; RISK-FACTOR; PATIENT; PROFESSIONALS; MELLITUS; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp16X683509
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Despite the availability of evidence-based guidance, many patients with type 2 diabetes do not achieve treatment goals. Aim To guide quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes by synthesising qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' and nurses' perceived influences on care. Design and setting Systematic review of qualitative studies with findings organised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Method Databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ASSIA from 1980 until March 2014. Studies included were Englishlanguage qualitative studies in primary care of physicians' or nurses' perceived influences on treatment goals for type 2 diabetes. Results A total of 32 studies were included: 17 address general diabetes care, 11 glycaemic control, three blood pressure, and one cholesterol control. Clinicians struggle to meet evolving treatment targets within limited time and resources, and are frustrated with resulting compromises. They lack confidence in knowledge of guidelines and skills, notably initiating insulin and facilitating patient behaviour change. Changing professional boundaries have resulted in uncertainty about where clinical responsibility resides. Accounts are often couched in emotional terms, especially frustrations over patient compliance and anxieties about treatment intensification. Conclusion Although resources are important, many barriers to improving care are amenable to behaviour change strategies. Improvement strategies need to account for differences between clinical targets and consider tailored rather than ` one size fits all' approaches. Training targeting knowledge is necessary but insufficient to bring about major change; approaches to improve diabetes care need to delineate roles and responsibilities, and address clinicians' skills and emotions around treatment intensification and facilitation of patient behaviour change.
引用
收藏
页码:E114 / E127
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Qigong for type 2 diabetes care: A systematic review
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Chen, Kevin W.
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Ernst, Edzard
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2009, 17 (04) : 236 - 242
  • [22] Barriers and facilitators of diabetes management by continuous glucose monitoring systems among adults with type 2 diabetes: a protocol of qualitative systematic review
    Zheng, Mingyue
    Patel, Anamica
    Khoja, Adeel
    Luo, Yunting
    Lin, Wei
    He, Qian
    Zhao, Xuan
    Wang, Juan
    Yang, Shenqiao
    Hu, Peng
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [23] Effectiveness of non-pharmacological strategies in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Leite, Renata Giacomini Oliveira Ferreira
    Banzato, Luisa Rocco
    Galendi, Julia Simoes Correa
    Mendes, Adriana Lucia
    Bolfi, Fernanda
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Thabane, Lehana
    Nunes-Nogueira, Vania dos Santos
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [24] Effective Interventions for Homebound Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
    Iregbu, Sandra
    Dawson, Aprill Z.
    Walker, Rebekah J.
    Egede, Leonard E.
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [25] Personality and weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review
    Geerling, Ralph
    Kothe, Emily J.
    Anglim, Jeromy
    Emerson, Catherine
    Holmes-Truscott, Elizabeth
    Speight, Jane
    FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE, 2022, 3
  • [26] Clinical and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alfarwan, Nawwarah
    Hodkinson, Alexander
    Panagioti, Maria
    Hassan, Lamiece
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2024, 41 (08)
  • [27] The management of people with type 2 diabetes with hypoglycaemic agents in primary care: retrospective cohort study
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    McManus, Richard J.
    Freemantle, Nick
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2007, 24 (03) : 224 - 229
  • [28] Perceived Barriers, Benefits, Facilitators, and Attitudes of Health Professionals Towards Multidisciplinary Team Care in Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review
    Dankoly, Usman Sani
    Vissers, Dirk
    El Farkouch, Zainab
    Kolasa, Esther
    Ziyyat, Abderrahim
    Van Rompaey, Bart
    Maamri, Abdellatif
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (06)
  • [29] A systematic review of barriers and enablers that health professionals experience to the delivery of type 2 diabetes care for adults with severe mental illness
    Dorey, Tracey
    Haddad, Mark
    McBain, Hayley
    Mulligan, Kathleen
    Zarska, Aneta
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 40 (07)
  • [30] Optimizing the diagnosis and management of dementia within primary care: a systematic review of systematic reviews
    Fernandes, Brooklynn
    Goodarzi, Zahra
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 22 (01)