Religious Unbelief in Three Western European Countries: Identifying and Characterizing Unbeliever Types Using Latent Class Analysis

被引:33
作者
Lindeman, Marjaana [1 ]
van Elk, Michiel [2 ]
Lipsanen, Jan [1 ]
Marin, Pinja [1 ]
Schjodt, Uffe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Psychol & Logoped, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Study Relig, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
COGNITIVE REFLECTION; PARANORMAL BELIEFS; NEW-AGE; SPIRITUALITY; AUTISM; PERSONALITY; NONBELIEF; ATHEISM; SCIENCE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1080/10508619.2019.1591140
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The different forms of religious unbelief are still much of an open question. Using data (N = 4,404) from three European countries-Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands-we sought to identify underlying unbeliever groups among those with the strongest disbelief in God (N = 2,258). Latent class analyses were conducted on the nontheistic supernatural beliefs of this subsection of participants, resulting in the same three unbeliever groups in each country: analytic atheists, spiritual but not religious (SBNR), and uncertain nonbelievers. Next, we explored these groups on a variety of dimensions, especially on the group members' attitudes to religion, certainty of beliefs, cognitive dispositions, and worldview. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed similarities as well as distinct characters for each of the latent groups. The groups differed most in intuitive thinking style, overmentalizing bias, and other ontological confusions. To compare the latent groups to all other individuals who took part in the study, two discriminant analyses were run with all participants. This resulted in four meaningful dimensions that supported and extended the ANOVAs findings and allowed for the consideration of other (non)believers. Overall, this study supports earlier findings on analytic atheists and SBNR while providing new information about their dispositions. Of interest, the uncertain nonbeliever group has been largely unexplored previously, and it should gain more attention in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 203
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Aarnio K., 2007, J INDIVID DIFFER, V28, P1, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1
[2]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[3]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL PARANORMAL R
[4]  
[Anonymous], COGNITION, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.005
[5]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[6]   After the new age [J].
Bainbridge, WS .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2004, 43 (03) :381-394
[7]   None Too Simple: Examining Issues of Religious Nonbelief and Nonbelonging in the United States [J].
Baker, Joseph O'Brian ;
Smith, Buster .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2009, 48 (04) :719-733
[8]   American on-line atheists and psychological type [J].
Baker, Matthew J. ;
Robbins, Mandy .
MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2012, 15 (10) :1077-1084
[9]   Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events [J].
Banerjee, Konika ;
Bloom, Paul .
COGNITION, 2014, 133 (01) :277-303
[10]   Elaboration and Attitude Strength: The New Meta-cognitive Perspective [J].
Barden, Jamie ;
Tormala, Zakary L. .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2014, 8 (01) :17-29