Consumers? valuation of a live video feed in restaurant kitchens for online food delivery service

被引:5
作者
Ding, Ye [1 ]
Nayga Jr, Rodolfo M. [2 ]
Zeng, Yinchu [1 ]
Yang, Wei [3 ]
Snell, Heather Arielle [3 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, 600 John Kimbrough Blvd, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, 217 Agr Bldg, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Live Kitchen; Online food delivery service; Food safety; Information provision; Choice experiment; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; INFORMATION; PREFERENCE; SAFETY; MODELS; LOGIT; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102373
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of online food delivery (OFD) service around the world, food safety issues are emerging. Traditional information-provision methods cannot alleviate the information asymmetry between consumers and restaurants in OFD service; therefore, a new approach must be found to increase consumers' information and gain their trust. Live Kitchen, a live video feed in restaurant kitchens, offers a new idea for providing food safety information through network technology. Using data from 683 respondents in Beijing and Shanghai in China, we examine consumers' valuation of Live Kitchen for OFD service by utilizing choice ex-periments and random parameter logit models with error components in WTP space. The results suggest that (i) consumers are willing to pay for Live Kitchen, more than traditional information-provision methods of license publicity and food safety supervision publicity, (ii) Live Kitchen can convey food safety information on OFD service to consumers, allowing them to draw a positive inference about the food safety of OFD service, and (iii) the application cost of Live Kitchen is much lower than the implied welfare gain.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]  
iiMedia Report, 2020, RES REPORT OPERATION
[22]  
iiMedia Report, 2017, 2016 2017 CHINA ONLI
[23]   RESPONDENT SCREENING AND REVEALED PREFERENCE AXIOMS TESTING QUARANTINING METHODS FOR ENHANCED DATA QUALITY IN WEB PANEL SURVEYS [J].
Jones, Michael S. ;
House, Lisa A. ;
Gao, Zhifeng .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (03) :687-709
[24]   Technology at the dinner table: Ordering food online through mobile apps [J].
Kapoor, Anuj Pal ;
Vij, Madhu .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2018, 43 :342-351
[25]   Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts [J].
Kardes, FR ;
Posavac, SS ;
Cronley, ML .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :230-256
[26]  
Lan H., 2016, Canadian Social Science, V12, P84
[27]   NEW APPROACH TO CONSUMER THEORY [J].
LANCASTER, KJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1966, 74 (02) :132-157
[28]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE BEHAVIORAL INTENTION TO USE FOOD DELIVERY APPS [J].
Lee, Eun-Yong ;
Lee, Soo-Bum ;
Jeon, Yu Jung Jennifer .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2017, 45 (09) :1461-1473
[29]   Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality [J].
Lee, Suk Won ;
Sung, Hye Jin ;
Jeon, Hyeon Mo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)
[30]   German and British Consumer Willingness to Pay for Beef Labeled with Food Safety Attributes [J].
Lewis, Karen E. ;
Grebitus, Carola ;
Colson, Gregory ;
Hu, Wuyang .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (02) :451-470