Consumers? valuation of a live video feed in restaurant kitchens for online food delivery service

被引:4
作者
Ding, Ye [1 ]
Nayga Jr, Rodolfo M. [2 ]
Zeng, Yinchu [1 ]
Yang, Wei [3 ]
Snell, Heather Arielle [3 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, 600 John Kimbrough Blvd, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, 217 Agr Bldg, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Live Kitchen; Online food delivery service; Food safety; Information provision; Choice experiment; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; INFORMATION; PREFERENCE; SAFETY; MODELS; LOGIT; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102373
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of online food delivery (OFD) service around the world, food safety issues are emerging. Traditional information-provision methods cannot alleviate the information asymmetry between consumers and restaurants in OFD service; therefore, a new approach must be found to increase consumers' information and gain their trust. Live Kitchen, a live video feed in restaurant kitchens, offers a new idea for providing food safety information through network technology. Using data from 683 respondents in Beijing and Shanghai in China, we examine consumers' valuation of Live Kitchen for OFD service by utilizing choice ex-periments and random parameter logit models with error components in WTP space. The results suggest that (i) consumers are willing to pay for Live Kitchen, more than traditional information-provision methods of license publicity and food safety supervision publicity, (ii) Live Kitchen can convey food safety information on OFD service to consumers, allowing them to draw a positive inference about the food safety of OFD service, and (iii) the application cost of Live Kitchen is much lower than the implied welfare gain.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   Consumer preference for a no-choice option [J].
Dhar, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (02) :215-231
[12]  
Dillman D. A., 2014, Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method, V4
[13]  
Gao ZF, 2010, J INT FOOD AGRIBUS M, V22, P108, DOI 10.1080/08974430903372898
[14]   Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Attributes [J].
Gao, Zhifeng ;
Schroeder, Ted C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (03) :795-809
[15]   Do consumers value hydroponics? Implications for organic certification [J].
Gilmour, Daniel N. ;
Bazzani, Claudia ;
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. ;
Snell, Heather A. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 50 (06) :707-721
[16]   Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models [J].
Greene, WH ;
Hensher, DA ;
Rose, J .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2006, 40 (01) :75-92
[17]  
Gupta M., 2019, Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev, V6, P889
[18]   How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load [J].
Hensher, David A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 21 (06) :861-878
[19]  
Hensher DA, 2015, APPLIED CHOICE ANALYSIS, 2ND EDITION, P189
[20]   Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment [J].
Hole, Arne Risa ;
Kolstad, Julie Riise .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (02) :445-469