Reactance, Restoration, and Cognitive Structure: Comparative Statics

被引:66
作者
Bessarabova, Elena [1 ]
Fink, Edward L. [2 ]
Turner, Monique [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Commun, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Commun, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Prevent & Community Hlth, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE; PERSUASION; MESSAGES; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1111/hcre.12007
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study (N=143) examined the effects of freedom threat on cognitive structures, using recycling as its topic. The results of a 2(Freedom Threat: low vs. high)x2(Postscript: restoration vs. filler) plus 1(Control) experiment indicated that, relative to the control condition, high freedom threat created a boomerang effect for the targeted attitude (recycling) as the attitude and behavioral intention changed in the opposite direction to the one advocated in the message. For the associated but untargeted attitude (energy conservation), reactance effects were less pronounced. Furthermore, a restoration postscript was examined as a reactance mitigation strategy. The restoration postscript was effective for high- but not low-threat messages.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 364
页数:26
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, PSYCHOL REACTANCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PUBLIC HLTH COMMUNIC, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410603029
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The psychology of attitude
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Theory and Methods of Scaling
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1977, DATA ANAL REGRESSION
[7]  
[Anonymous], DEEP PART DIV GLOB W
[8]  
Backer T.E., 1992, Designing health communication campaigns: What works?
[9]  
Barnett G.A., 1983, INTERCULTURAL COMMUN, P171
[10]  
BARNETT GA, 1979, QUAL QUANT, V13, P215