Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production

被引:24
作者
Pribyl, J. [1 ]
Madsen, P. [2 ]
Bauer, J. [1 ]
Pribylova, J. [1 ]
Simeckova, M. [1 ]
Vostry, L. [1 ]
Zavadilova, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Anim Sci, Prague 10401, Czech Republic
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
genomic breeding value; single-step prediction; BLUP; genomic relationship; DAIRY SIRES; SELECTION; PREDICTIONS; CATTLE; INFORMATION; PEDIGREE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2012-6157
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Estimated breeding values (EBV) for first-lactation milk production of Holstein cattle in the Czech Republic were calculated using a conventional animal model and by single-step prediction of the genomic enhanced breeding value. Two overlapping data sets of milk production data were evaluated: (1) calving years 1991 to 2006, with 861,429 lactations and 1,918,901 animals in the pedigree and (2) calving years 1991 to 2010, with 1,097,319 lactations and 1,906,576 animals in the pedigree. Global Interbull (Uppsala, Sweden) deregressed proofs of 114,189 bulls were used in the analyses. Reliabilities of Interbull values were equivalent to an average of 8.53 effective records, which were used in a weighted analysis. A total of 1,341 bulls were genotyped using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip V2 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Among the genotyped bulls were 332 young bulls with no daughters in the first data set but more than 50 daughters (88.41, on average) with performance records in the second data set. For young bulls, correlations of EBV and genomic enhanced breeding value before and after progeny testing, corresponding average expected reliabilities, and effective daughter contributions (ED C) were calculated. The reliability of prediction pedigree EBV of young bulls was 0.41, corresponding to EDC = 10.6. Including Interbull deregressed proofs improved the reliability of prediction by EDC = 13.4 and including genotyping improved prediction reliability by EDC = 6.2. Total average expected reliability of prediction reached 0.67, corresponding to EDC = 30.2. The combination of domestic and Interbull sources for both genotyped and nongenotyped animals is valuable for improving the accuracy of genetic prediction in small populations of dairy cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:1865 / 1873
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] High resolution melting as an alternative method to genotype diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) K232A polymorphism in cattle
    Abdolmohammadi, A.
    Atashi, H.
    Zamani, P.
    Bottema, C.
    [J]. CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 56 (08) : 370 - 376
  • [2] Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins
    Aguilar, I.
    Misztal, I.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Wiggans, G. R.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (05) : 2621 - 2624
  • [3] Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score
    Aguilar, I.
    Misztal, I.
    Johnson, D. L.
    Legarra, A.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) : 743 - 752
  • [4] The association of five polymorphisms with milk production traits in Czech Fleckvieh cattle
    Boleckova, J.
    Matejickova, J.
    Stipkova, M.
    Kyselova, J.
    Barton, L.
    [J]. CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 57 (02) : 45 - 53
  • [5] Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens
    Chen, C. Y.
    Misztal, I.
    Aguilar, I.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    Aggrey, S. E.
    Wing, T.
    Muir, W. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [6] Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Lund, Mogens S.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42
  • [7] Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information
    Forni, Selma
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Misztal, Ignacy
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
  • [8] Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population
    Gao, Hongding
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Nielsen, Ulrik S.
    Zhang, Yuan
    Lund, Mogens S.
    Su, Guosheng
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [9] Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection
    Goddard, M. E.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2011, 128 (06) : 409 - 421
  • [10] Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges
    Hayes, B. J.
    Bowman, P. J.
    Chamberlain, A. J.
    Goddard, M. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (02) : 433 - 443