Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effects Scale for Clozapine - Development and validation of a clozapine-specific side-effects scale

被引:47
作者
Hynes, Caroline [1 ]
Keating, Dolores [1 ]
McWilliams, Stephen [1 ]
Madigan, Kevin [2 ]
Kinsella, Anthony [2 ]
Maidment, Ian [3 ]
Feetam, Celia [3 ]
Drake, Richard J. [4 ]
Haddad, Peter M. [5 ]
Gaughran, Fiona [6 ]
Taylor, Mark [7 ]
Clarke, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] St John God Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[2] DETECT Early Intervent Psychosis Serv, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Greater Manchester Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Psychosis Unit, London, England
[7] NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Adverse effects; Atypical antipsychotic agent; Drug monitoring; Questionnaire; Checklist; SELF-RATING SCALE; SCHIZOPHRENIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.052
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The authors developed and validated a clozapine-specific side-effects scale capable of eliciting the subjectively unpleasant side-effects of clozapine. Methods: Questions from the original Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effects Scale (GASS) were compared to a list of the most commonly reported clozapine side-effects and those with a significant subjective burden were included in the GASS for Clozapine (GASS-C). The original authors of the GASS and a group of mental health professionals from the UK and Ireland were enlisted to comment on the questions in the GASS-C based on their clinical experience. 110 clozapine outpatients from two sites completed the GASS-C, the original GASS and a repeat GASS-C. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 19. Results: The GASS-C was shown to have construct validity, in that Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.816 (p < 0.001) with the original GASS, whilst Cohen's kappa coefficient was >0.77 (p < 0.001) for one question and >0.81 (p < 0.001) for remaining relevant questions. GASS-C was also shown to have strong test-retest reliability, in that Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.907 (p < 0.001), whilst Cohen's kappa coefficient was >0.81 (p < 0.001) for 12 questions and >0.61 (p < 0.001) for the remaining four questions. Conclusion: The GASS-C is a valid and reliable clinical tool to enable a systematic assessment of the subjectively unpleasant side-effects of clozapine. Future research should focus on how the scale can be utilised as a clinical tool to improve real-world outcomes such as adherence to clozapine therapy and quality of life. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 513
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] SMARTS (Systematic Monitoring of Adverse events Related to TreatmentS): The development of a pragmatic patientcompleted checklist to assess antipsychotic drug side effects
    Haddad, Peter M.
    Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang
    Peuskens, Joseph
    Cavallaro, Roberto
    Lean, Michael E. J.
    Morozova, Margarita
    Reynolds, Gavin
    Azorin, Jean-Michel
    Thomas, Pierre
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 4 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [12] Side-effects and treatment with clozapine: A comparison between the views of consumers and their clinicians
    Hodge, Kay
    Jespersen, Sean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2008, 17 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [13] Iqbal Mohammad Masud, 2003, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V15, P33, DOI 10.1023/A:1023228626309
  • [14] A brief version of the Subjects' Response to Antipsychotics questionnaire to evaluate treatment effects
    Lako, Irene M.
    Bruggeman, Richard
    Liemburg, Edith J.
    van den Heuvel, Edwin R.
    Knegtering, Henderikus
    Slooff, Cees J.
    Wiersma, Durk
    Taxis, Katja
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2013, 147 (01) : 175 - 180
  • [15] Randomized controlled trial of effect of prescription of clozapine versus other second-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia
    Lewis, Shon W.
    Barnes, Thomas R. E.
    Davies, Linda
    Murray, Robin M.
    Dunn, Graham
    Hayhurst, Karen P.
    Markwick, Alison
    Lloyd, Helen
    Jones, Peter B.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (04) : 715 - 723
  • [16] Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment
    McEvoy, JP
    Lieberman, JA
    Stroup, TS
    Davis, SM
    Meltzer, HY
    Rosenheck, RA
    Swartz, MS
    Perkins, DO
    Keefe, RSE
    Davis, CE
    Severe, J
    Hsiao, JK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (04) : 600 - 610
  • [17] Optimizing clozapine treatment
    Nielsen, J.
    Damkier, P.
    Lublin, H.
    Taylor, D.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 123 (06) : 411 - 422
  • [18] Novartis, 2010, CLOZ PAT MON SERV CL
  • [19] Interrater reliability of the Antipsychotic Non-Neurological Side-Effects Rating Scale measured in patients treated with clozapine
    Ohlsen, R. I.
    Williamson, R.
    Yusufi, B.
    Mullan, J.
    Irving, D.
    Mukherjee, S.
    Page, E.
    Aitchison, K. J.
    Barnes, T. R. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [20] Life-threatening clozapine-induced gastrointestinal hypomotility: An analysis of 102 cases
    Palmer, Susanna E.
    McLean, Rachael M.
    Ellis, Peter M.
    Harrison-Woolrych, Mira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 69 (05) : 759 - 768