Immediate Versus Delayed Radical Prostatectomy: Updated Outcomes Following Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer

被引:44
|
作者
Filippou, Pauline [1 ]
Welty, Christopher J. [1 ]
Cowan, Janet E. [1 ]
Perez, Nannette [1 ]
Shinohara, Katsuto [1 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Active surveillance; Outcomes; Pathology; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; LOW-RISK; MEN; STRAIGHTFORWARD; RECURRENCE; COHORT; TRENDS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Biopsy progression on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) often reflects failure of the initial biopsy to detect cancer present at enrollment. The risks for delayed treatment among men who progress on AS are not well defined. Objective: To report outcomes for men who underwent surgery after AS compared to men who underwent immediate surgery and the influence of selection bias on this outcome. Design, setting, and participants: AS-eligible (ASE) men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) after a median of 20 mo of AS were compared to ASE men who underwent RP within 6 mo of diagnosis. A subset of men on AS who underwent RP after upgrade to Gleason 3 + 4 was compared to matched controls with similar pretreatment biopsy features who underwent immediate RP. Outcome measurement and statistical analysis: Rates of adverse pathology (upstaging, positive surgical margin, or Gleason upgrading) were examined. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between treatment subgroup and adverse pathology. Results and limitations: Of 157 ASE men who underwent delayed RP after AS, 54 were upgraded to Gleason 3 + 4 before surgery. ASE men who underwent immediate RP had lower probability of adverse pathology than ASE men who underwent delayed RP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.55). The rate of adverse pathology did not differ between immediate and delayed RP patients matched for pretreatment characteristics (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.27-2.28). The observational design of this study is its main limitation. Conclusions: When compared to men with similar pretreatment biopsy features, those who underwent delayed RP were not at higher risk of adverse pathology. Patient summary: The oncologic safety of delayed treatment when indicated for men enrolled in active surveillance for prostate cancer is important. We found that men who underwent delayed surgery had similar outcomes to men who underwent immediate prostatectomy. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate Cancer Mortality following Active Surveillance versus Immediate Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Jing
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Gulati, Roman
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Gore, John L.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Etzioni, Ruth
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (19) : 5471 - 5478
  • [2] Prospective quality-of-life outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer: Active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Hurwitz, Lauren M.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Levie, Katherine E.
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Johnston, Richard B.
    Pham, Khanh N.
    Rosner, Inger L.
    Brand, Timothy C.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Sterbis, Joseph R.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Porter, Christopher R.
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (14) : 2465 - 2473
  • [3] Delayed radical prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance is not associated with the use of secondary treatments compared with immediate prostatectomy
    Arcot, Rohith
    Cher, Michael L.
    Qi, Ji
    Linsell, Susan M.
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    George, Arvin K.
    Montie, James E.
    Ginsburg, Kevin B.
    PROSTATE, 2022, 82 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [4] Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Langkilde, Niels Christian
    Borre, Michael
    Jakobsen, Erik B.
    Frey, Anders
    Lund, Lars
    Lunden, Dagmar
    Dah, Claus
    Brasso, Klaus
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (04) : E814 - E821
  • [5] The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional Cohort
    Shee, Kevin
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Washington III, Samuel L.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (04): : 838 - 843
  • [6] Outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients meeting criteria for active surveillance
    Dellavedova, T.
    Ponzano, R. M.
    Sarria, J. P.
    Minuzzi, P. G.
    Nobile, R. H.
    Minuzzi, F. G.
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (04): : 342 - 349
  • [7] Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort
    Wong, Lih-Ming
    Tang, Vincent
    Peters, Justin
    Costello, Anthony
    Corcoran, Niall
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 82 - 87
  • [8] Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Asif, Aqua
    Ng, Alexander
    Gbolahan, Olayinka
    Dinneen, Eoin
    To, Wilson
    Kadhim, Hassan
    Premchand, Melissa
    Burton, Oliver
    Koe, Jasmine Sze-Ern
    Wang, Nicole
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Vasdev, Nikhil
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Ng, Chi Fai
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [9] Optimal timing of early versus delayed adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Lynch, John H.
    Collins, Sean P.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (03) : 303 - 308
  • [10] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Zanaty, Marc
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zorn, Kevin
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1391 - 1397