Different Treatment Modalities followed by Dental Practitioners for Ellis Class 2 Fracture - A Questionnaire-based Survey

被引:134
作者
Jose, Jerry [1 ]
Ajitha, P. [1 ]
Subbaiyan, Haripriya [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Dent Coll, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Dental practitioners; Composites; Enamel bevelling; Reattachment; Endodontic therapy; PTFE; ANTERIOR TEETH; REATTACHMENT; TRAUMATOLOGY; INJURIES; VITALITY; ENAMEL; TOOTH;
D O I
10.2174/1874210602014010059
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Dental trauma is one of the most commonly seen injuries involving teeth and surrounding structures. The frequent causes of dental trauma are usually falls, traffic accidents, fights and sports injuries. Rapid treatment can prevent long-term damage to the orofacial structures and save the teeth. Ellis class 2 fracture is classified as the involvement of enamel and dentin excluding pulp. Dental practitioners are used to treating Ellis class 2 fracture very often in their dental practice and is usually considered as a dilemma among dental practitioners for the different treatment modalities followed for treatment of Ellis class 2 fracture. A survey is done among dental practitioners to assess the different treatment modalities followed by them in the case of Ellis class 2 fracture. Materials and Methods: A survey was done among 380 dental practitioners in the Chennai region in which 360 dental practitioners responded. The survey was distributed through electronic media and other means of communication. The survey data was collected, analysed and interpreted. Results: The results suggested that about 90% of dental practitioners had adequate knowledge and attitude towards the management of dental traumatic injuries. However, the practical application of the different treatment modalities was seen to be varied among dental practitioners. Based on this survey it was clear that majority of the dental practitioners in Chennai have good knowledge, attitude but there was a lack of clinical practice regarding the different treatment modalities followed by general practitioners for Ellis class 2 fracture. Conclusion: The survey shows that dental practitioners have a sound knowledge, attitude, but the practical application of the various treatment modalities available was seen to vary among various dental practitioners for Ellis class 2 fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Agarwal N, 2018, INT J SCI RES AHMEDA, V7
[2]  
Albers H., 2002, Tooth-Colored Restoratives: Principles and Techniques, V9th
[3]   Epidemiology of Traumatic Dental Injuries [J].
Andersson, Lars .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (03) :S2-S5
[4]  
Andreasen J O, 2018, Textbook and Colour Atlas of Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth
[5]  
ANDREASEN JO, 1990, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V6, P78
[6]   A retrospective study of traumatic dental injuries [J].
Atabek, Didem ;
Alacam, Alev ;
Aydintug, Itir ;
Konakoglu, Gonca .
DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2014, 30 (02) :154-161
[7]   Epidemiology of dental trauma: A review of the literature [J].
Bastone, EB ;
Freer, TJ ;
McNamara, JR .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2000, 45 (01) :2-9
[8]  
Bergenholtz G, 1974, Odontol Revy, V25, P347
[9]   Surgical extrusion as a treatment option for crown-root fracture in permanent anterior teeth: a systematic review [J].
Das, Bhaskar ;
Muthu, Murugan Satta .
DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2013, 29 (06) :423-431
[10]   International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth [J].
DiAngelis, Anthony J. ;
Andreasen, Jens O. ;
Ebeleseder, Kurt A. ;
Kenny, David J. ;
Trope, Martin ;
Sigurdsson, Asgeir ;
Andersson, Lars ;
Bourguignon, Cecilia ;
Therese Flores, Marie ;
Hicks, Morris Lamar ;
Lenzi, Antonio R. ;
Malmgren, Barbro ;
Moule, Alex J. ;
Pohl, Yango ;
Tsukiboshi, Mitsuhiro .
DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) :2-12