Three-Dimensional Quantitative Tumor Response and Survival Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Failed Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization: Repeat or Switch Treatment?

Simple Summary Transarterial chemoembolization is the main therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma; it has demonstrated efficacy and survival benefits. However, treatment success cannot always be achieved after one treatment session. Using a quantitative 3D tumor-response assessment, we showed that a second transarterial chemoembolization in patients who initially do not respond to therapy results in both objective tumor response and survival benefits. Thus, at least two sessions should be performed before TACE is abandoned and alternative treatments are considered. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess treatment responses and evaluate survival outcomes between responders and non-responders after each transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) session using the 3D quantitative criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (qEASL) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: A total of 94 consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging before and after TACE were retrospectively included. Volumetric tumor enhancement (qEASL) was expressed in cubic centimeters (cm(3)). The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) for the non-/responders. Results: In total, 28 (29.8%) patients showed a response after the first TACE. These responders demonstrated a clear trend toward longer OS compared with the non-responders (36.7 vs. 21.5 months, p = 0.071). Of the 43 initial non-responders who underwent a second TACE within 3 months and had complete follow-up imaging, 15/43 (34.9%) achieved a response, and their median OS was significantly longer than that of the 28 non-responders to the second TACE (47.8 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.01). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in OS between the 28 patients who achieved a response after the first TACE and the 15 initial non-responders who achieved a response after the second TACE (36.7 vs. 47.8 months, p = 0.701). The difference in OS between the responders and non-responders after the third TACE was not significant (11.4 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.986). Conclusion: Our study quantitatively demonstrated that a second TACE can be beneficial in terms of tumor response and survival for HCC patients who do not initially respond to TACE.