CCM Key Comparison CCM.D-K2 Comparison of liquid density standards Final Report

被引:2
|
作者
Bettin, Horst [1 ]
Jacques, Claude [2 ]
Zelenka, Zoltan [3 ]
Fujii, Ken-ichi [4 ]
Kuramoto, Naoki [4 ]
Chang, Kyung-Ho [5 ]
Lee, Yong Jae [5 ]
Omar Becerra, Luis [6 ]
Domostroeva, Natalia [7 ]
机构
[1] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Natl Res Council Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[3] Magyar Kereskedelmi Engedelyezesi Hivatal, H-1124 Budapest, Hungary
[4] AIST, Natl Metrol Inst Japan, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058563, Japan
[5] Korea Res Inst Stand & Sci, Taejon 305600, South Korea
[6] Ctr Nacl Metrol, El Marques 76241, Queretaro, Mexico
[7] DI Mendeleyev Inst Metrol, St Petersburg 190005, Russia
关键词
WATER;
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/07006
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The results are presented of the key comparison CCM.D-K2 that covered the density measurements of four liquids: the density of water at 20 degrees C, of pentadecane at 15 degrees C, 20 degrees C, 40 degrees C and 60 degrees C, of tetrachloroethlyene at 5 degrees C and 20 degrees C and of a viscosity oil at 20 degrees C. Seven national metrology institutes measured the densities at atmospheric pressure by hydrostatic weighing of solid density standards in the time interval from 27 April 2004 to 28 June 2004. Since the participants were asked not to include components for a possible drift or inhomogeneity of the liquid in their uncertainty budget, these uncertainty contributions are investigated for the final evaluation of the data. For this purpose, results of stability and homogeneity measurements of the pilot laboratory are used. The participants decided not to include a possible drift of the liquid's density since no significant drift could be detected, and the influence of the drift and its uncertainty are negligible. Similarly, the inhomogeneity of the water and pentadecane samples is not significant and has no influence on the evaluation. Thus, it was neglected. Only the inhomogeneities of tetrachloroethylene and of the viscosity oil were significant. Consequently, they were included in the evaluation. With one or two exceptions, the results show good agreement among the participants. Only in the case of water the results are clearly discrepant. The key comparison reference values were calculated by the weighted mean (taking into account a small correlation between two participants) in the case of consistent results. Otherwise the Procedure B of Cox was used. The expanded uncertainties of all reference densities are below 1 . 10(-5) in relative terms. This satisfies the needs of all customers who wish to calibrate or check liquid density measuring instruments such as oscillation-type density meters. The comparison fully supports the calibration measurement capabilities table in the BIPM key comparison database. The results can be used to link regional comparisons to this CCM key comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Final Report on EUROMET Key Comparison EUROMETMD-K2 (EUROMET 627) Comparison of density determinations of liquid samples
    Bettin, Horst
    Heinonen, Martti
    Gosset, Andre
    Zelenka, Zoltan
    Lorefice, Salvatore
    Hellerud, Kristen
    Durlik, Hanna
    Jordaan, Werner
    Field, Ireen
    METROLOGIA, 2016, 53
  • [2] Density of pure and mixed NaCl and CaCl2 aqueous solutions at 293 K to 353 K and 0.1 MPa: an integrated comparison of analytical and numerical data
    Hoffert, Ulrike
    Andre, Laurent
    Blocher, Guido
    Guignot, Sylvain
    Lassin, Arnault
    Milsch, Harald
    Sass, Ingo
    GEOTHERMAL ENERGY, 2024, 12 (01):