Local and global sensitivity analysis for a reactor design with parameter uncertainty

被引:71
作者
Haaker, MPR [1 ]
Verheijen, PJT [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Delft, Dept Chem Engn, Proc Syst Engn Grp, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST); parameter correlation; CFC;
D O I
10.1205/026387604323142630
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Parameter uncertainty is taken into account in the evaluation of a multitubular fixed-bed catalytic reactor design. It concerns the conversion of CFC based on laboratory observations. Uncertainty analysis based on sensitivity analysis of a reactor model is carried out to evaluate reactor operability and to deal with the parameter uncertainty. The theory and practical implementation of a linear (direct differential method) and a non-linear (Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test) technique for sensitivity analysis are presented. The sensitivity techniques have been implemented in an equation-oriented software environment, which simultaneously solves all differential and algebraic equations. Both sensitivity techniques are illustrated for and compared with a non-linear analytical function and applied in the uncertainty analysis of the reactor model. Correlation information between the uncertain parameters has been included in the analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Tackling quantitatively large dimensionality problems [J].
Campolongo, F ;
Tarantola, S ;
Saltelli, A .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 117 (1-2) :75-85
[2]   NON-LINEAR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-PARAMETER MODEL SYSTEMS [J].
CUKIER, RI ;
LEVINE, HB ;
SHULER, KE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1978, 26 (01) :1-42
[3]   STUDY OF SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS .3. ANALYSIS OF APPROXIMATIONS [J].
CUKIER, RI ;
SCHAIBLY, JH ;
SHULER, KE .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1975, 63 (03) :1140-1149
[4]   STUDY OF SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS .1. THEORY [J].
CUKIER, RI ;
FORTUIN, CM ;
SHULER, KE ;
PETSCHEK, AG ;
SCHAIBLY, JH .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1973, 59 (08) :3873-3878
[5]   A COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES [J].
HAMBY, DM .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1995, 68 (02) :195-204
[6]  
HAMBY DM, 1999, SAFETY RELABILITY
[7]   UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FOR RADIOACTIVE-WASTE DISPOSAL [J].
HELTON, JC .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1993, 42 (2-3) :327-367
[8]   AUTOMATIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF KINETIC MECHANISMS [J].
KODA, M ;
MCRAE, GJ ;
SEINFELD, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS, 1979, 11 (04) :427-444
[9]   Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method [J].
Lu, YC ;
Mohanty, S .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (03) :275-291
[10]   Development of a palladium on activated carbon for a conceptual process in the selective hydrogenolysis of CCl2F2 (CFC-12) into CH2F2 (HFC-32) [J].
Makkee, M ;
Wiersma, A ;
van de Sandt, EJAX ;
van Bekkum, H ;
Moulijn, JA .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2000, 55 (1-2) :125-137