Recycling Rates of Aluminum in the United States

被引:26
|
作者
Chen, Wei-Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Ctr Ind Ecol, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
aluminum recycling; collection rate; industrial ecology; material flow analysis (MFA); recovery efficiency; substance flow analysis (SFA); MAINLAND CHINA; FLOW-ANALYSIS; STOCKS; SCRAP;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12070
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recycling rates of aluminum are defined in different (sometimes inconsistent) ways and poorly quantified. To address this situation, the definitions and calculation methods of four groups of indicators are specified for the United States: (1) indicators used to measure recycling efficiencies of old aluminum scrap at the end-of-life (EOL) stage, including EOL collection rate (CR), EOL processing rate, EOL recycling rate, and EOL domestic recycling rate; (2) indicators used to compare generation or use of new with old scrap, including new to old scrap ratio, new scrap ratio (NSR), and old scrap ratio; (3) indicators used to compare production or use of primary aluminum with secondary aluminum, including four recycling input rates (RIRs); and (4) indicators used to track the sinks of aluminum metal in the U.S. anthroposphere. I find that the central estimate of EOL CR varies between 38% and 65% in the United States from 1980 to 2009 and shares a relatively similar historical trend with the primary aluminum price. The RIR is shown to be significantly reduced if excluding secondary aluminum produced from new scrap resulting from the relatively high NSR. In 2003, a time when approximately 73% of all of the aluminum produced globally since 1950 was considered to still be in service, approximately 68% to 69% of all metallic aluminum that had entered the U.S. anthroposphere since 1900 was still in use: 67% in domestic in-use stock and 1% to 2% exported as scrap. Only 6% to 7% was definitely lost to the environment, although the destination of 25% of the aluminum was unknown. It was either exported as EOL products, was currently hibernating, or was lost during collection.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 938
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the Recycling Potential of Aluminum in Japan, the United States, Europe and China
    Hatayama, Hiroki
    Daigo, Ichiro
    Matsuno, Yasunari
    Adachi, Yoshihiro
    MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS, 2009, 50 (03) : 650 - 656
  • [2] Repurposing and recycling wind turbine blades in the United States
    Martini, Ryan
    Xydis, George
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2023, 42 (01)
  • [3] Evaluating strategies to increase PET bottle recycling in the United States
    Basuhi, R.
    Bhuwalka, Karan
    Roth, Richard
    Olivetti, Elsa A.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 28 (04) : 916 - 927
  • [4] Dynamic analysis of aluminum stocks and flows in the United States: 1900-2009
    Chen, Wei-Qiang
    Graedel, T. E.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 81 : 92 - 102
  • [5] United States plastics: Large flows, short lifetimes, and negligible recycling
    Di, Jinghan
    Reck, Barbara K.
    Miatto, Alessio
    Graedel, Thomas E.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 167
  • [6] Recycling of automotive aluminum
    Cui, Jirang
    Roven, Hans J.
    TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2010, 20 (11) : 2057 - 2063
  • [7] Current efficiency of recycling aluminum from aluminum scraps by electrolysis
    Xu, Jun-li
    Zhang, Jing
    Shi, Zhong-ning
    Gao, Bing-liang
    Wang, Zhao-wen
    Hu, Xian-wei
    TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2014, 24 (01) : 250 - 256
  • [8] Dynamic Product-Level Analysis of In-Use Aluminum Stocks in the United States
    Chen, Wei-Qiang
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (06) : 1425 - 1435
  • [9] Copper Recycling Flow Model for the United States Economy: Impact of Scrap Quality on Potential Energy Benefit
    Wang, Tong
    Berrill, Peter
    Zimmerman, Julie B.
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (08) : 5485 - 5495
  • [10] Trash or treasure? Prospects for full aluminum chain in China based on the recycling options
    Xue, Jingyan
    Liu, Gengyuan
    Brown, Mark T.
    Casazza, Marco
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 193 : 217 - 227