Range and modulation dependencies for proton beam dose per monitor unit calculations

被引:13
作者
Hsi, Wen C. [1 ,2 ]
Schreuder, Andries N. [3 ]
Moyers, Michael F. [4 ]
Allgower, Chris E. [1 ]
Farr, Jonathan B. [1 ,5 ]
Mascia, Anthony E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Inst, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Proton Therapy Inst, Jacksonville, FL 32206 USA
[3] ProCure Treatment Ctr Inc, Bloomington, IN 47404 USA
[4] Proton Therapy Inc, Colton, CA 92324 USA
[5] Univ Klinikum, Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum, D-45147 Essen, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
beam handling techniques; dosimetry; radiation monitoring; radiation therapy; ANALYTICAL APPROXIMATION; DOSIMETRY; RADIOTHERAPY; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1118/1.3056466
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Calculations of dose per monitor unit (D/MU) are required in addition to measurements to increase patient safety in the clinical practice of proton radiotherapy. As in conventional photon and electron therapy, the D/MU depends on several factors. This study focused on obtaining range and modulation dependence factors used in D/MU calculations for the double scattered proton beam line at the Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Institute. Three dependencies on range and one dependency on modulation were found. A carefully selected set of measurements was performed to discern these individual dependencies. Dependencies on range were due to: (1) the stopping power of the protons passing through the monitor chamber; (2) the reduction of proton fluence due to nuclear interactions within the patient; and (3) the variation of proton fluence passing through the monitor chamber due to different source-to-axis distances (SADs) for different beam ranges. Different SADs are produced by reconfigurations of beamline elements to provide different field sizes and ranges. The SAD effect on the D/MU varies smoothly as the beam range is varied, except at the beam range for which the first scatterers are exchanged and relocated to accommodate low and high beam ranges. A geometry factor was devised to model the SAD variation effect on the D/MU. The measured D/MU variation as a function of range can be predicted within 1% using the three modeled dependencies on range. Investigation of modulated beams showed that an analytical formula can predict the D/MU dependency as a function of modulation to within 1.5%. Special attention must be applied when measuring the D/MU dependence on modulation to avoid interplay between range and SAD effects.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 641
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Experiences with an application of industrial robotics for accurate patient positioning in proton radiotherapy [J].
Allgower, C. E. ;
Schreuder, A. N. ;
Farr, J. B. ;
Mascia, A. E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2007, 3 (01) :72-81
[2]   THE INDIANA-UNIVERSITY PROTON RADIATION-THERAPY PROJECT [J].
BLOCH, C ;
DERENCHUK, V ;
CAMERON, J ;
FASANO, M ;
GILMORE, J ;
HASHEMIAN, R ;
HORNBACK, N ;
LOW, DA ;
MORPHIS, J ;
PETERSON, C ;
ROSSELOT, D ;
SANDISON, G ;
SHEN, RN ;
SHIDNIA, H .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1993, 79 (1-4) :890-894
[3]   An analytical approximation of depth-dose distributions for therapeutic proton beams [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Schlegel, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (08) :1331-1339
[4]   An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams [J].
Bortfeld, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :2024-2033
[5]  
EVAN RD, 1982, ATOMIC NUCL
[6]   A GENERAL-SOLUTION TO CHARGED-PARTICLE BEAM FLATTENING USING AN OPTIMIZED DUAL-SCATTERING-FOIL TECHNIQUE, WITH APPLICATION TO PROTON THERAPY BEAMS [J].
GRUSELL, E ;
MONTELIUS, A ;
BRAHME, A ;
RIKNER, G ;
RUSSELL, K .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (12) :2201-2216
[7]   Spread-out Bragg peak and monitor units calculation with the Monte Carlo code MCNPX [J].
Herault, J. ;
Iborra, N. ;
Serrano, B. ;
Chauvel, P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) :680-688
[8]  
HSI W, MED PHYS IN PRESS
[9]  
Janni J. F., 1982, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, V27, P147, DOI 10.1016/0092-640X(82)90004-3
[10]  
KOEHLER A M, 1977, Medical Physics (Woodbury), V4, P297, DOI 10.1118/1.594317