Reviewing ISO Compliant Multifunctionality Practices in Environmental Life Cycle Modeling

被引:35
作者
Moretti, Christian [1 ]
Corona, Blanca [1 ]
Edwards, Robert [2 ]
Junginger, Martin [1 ]
Moro, Alberto [2 ]
Rocco, Matteo [3 ]
Shen, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, I-21056 Milan, Italy
关键词
bibliometrics; review; life cycle assessment (LCA); allocation; system expansion; CO-PRODUCT ALLOCATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GHG EMISSIONS; PATH-ANALYSIS; PART; LCA; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; POLICY; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.3390/en13143579
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The standard ISO 14044:2006 defines the hierarchical steps to follow when solving multifunctionality issues in life cycle assessment (LCA). However, the practical implementation of such a hierarchy has been debated for twenty-five years leading to different implementation practices from LCA practitioners. The first part of this study discussed the main steps where the ISO hierarchy has been implemented differently and explored current multifunctionality practices in peer-reviewed studies. A text-mining process was applied to quantitatively assess such practices in the 532 multifunctional case studies found in the literature. In the second part of the study, citation network analysis (CNA) was used to identify the major publications that influenced the development of the multifunctionality-debate in LCA, i.e., the key-route main path. The identified publications were then reviewed to detect the origins of the different practices and their underlying theories. Based on these insights, this study provided some "food for thought" on current practices to move towards consistent methodology. We believe that such an advancement is urgently needed for better positioning LCA as a tool for sustainability decision-making. In particular, consistent allocation practices could be especially beneficial in bioeconomy sectors, where production processes are usually multifunctional, and where current allocation practices are not harmonized yet.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   Flaws in the interpretation phase of bioenergy LCA fuel the debate and mislead policymakers [J].
Agostini, Alessandro ;
Giuntoli, Jacopo ;
Marelli, Luisa ;
Amaducci, Stefano .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01) :17-35
[2]   Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems - key issues and recommendations [J].
Ahlgren, Serina ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Ekman, Anna ;
Karlsson, Hanna ;
Berlin, Johanna ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Janssen, Matty ;
Strid, Ingrid .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (05) :606-619
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ISO 14041
[5]  
[Anonymous], PEFCR GUID DOC GUID
[6]   LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND LINEAR-PROGRAMMING - ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIMIZATION OF PRODUCT SYSTEM [J].
AZAPAGIC, A ;
CLIFT, R .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 19 :S229-S234
[7]  
Azapagic A., 1999, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, V4, P357
[8]  
Azapagic A., 1999, J CLEANER PROD, V7, P101, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00046-8
[9]  
Azapagic A., 1998, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, V3, P305, DOI [10.1007/BF02979340, DOI 10.1007/BF02979340]
[10]  
Azapagic A., 2000, The international journal of life cycle assessment, V5, P31, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02978557