MRI-measured adipose features as predictive factors for detection of prostate cancer in males undergoing systematic prostate biopsy: a retrospective study based on a Chinese population

被引:2
|
作者
Xiong, Tianyu [1 ]
Cao, Fang [1 ]
Zhu, Guangyi [2 ]
Ye, Xiaobo [1 ]
Cui, Yun [1 ]
Zhang, Huibo [3 ]
Niu, Yinong [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Shijitan Hosp, Dept Urol, 10 Tieyiyuan Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Adipose tissue; prostate cancer; nomogram; magnetic resonance imaging; biopsy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; FAT THICKNESS; RISK; VALIDATION; NOMOGRAM; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/21623945.2022.2148885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 901 men undergoing ultrasonography-guided systematic prostate biopsy between March 2013 and May 2022. Adipose features, including periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness, were measured using MRI before biopsy. Prediction models of all PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (Gleason score higher than 6) were established based on variables selected by multivariate logistic regression and prediction nomograms were constructed. Patients with PCa had higher PPAT thickness (4.64 [3.65-5.86] vs. 3.54 [2.49-4.51] mm, p < 0.001) and subcutaneous fat thickness (29.19 [23.05-35.95] vs. 27.90 [21.43-33.93] mm, p = 0.013) than those without PCa. Patients with csPCa had higher PPAT thickness (4.78 [3.80-5.88] vs. 4.52 [3.80-5.63] mm, p = 0.041) than those with non-csPCa. Adding adipose features to the prediction models significantly increased the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of all PCa (0.850 vs. 0.819, p < 0.001) and csPCa (0.827 vs. 0.798, p < 0.001). Based on MRI-measured adipose features and clinical parameters, we established two nomograms that were simple to use and could improve patient selection for prostate biopsy in Chinese population.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 664
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Prognosis of men with high-risk prostate cancer stratified by risk factors: a population-based retrospective cohort study
    Song, Pan
    Wang, Jiaxiang
    Shu, Mengxuan
    Di, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yaxin
    Qing, Yuxin
    Dong, Qiang
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (10) : 6013 - 6025
  • [22] Digital rectal examination and its associated factors in the early detection of prostate cancer: a cross-sectional population-based study
    Mafra Soares, Samara Carollyne
    Cancela, Marianna de Camargo
    Migowski, Arn
    Bezerra de Souza, Dyego Leandro
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of the new biopsy strategy combining 6-core systematic and 3-core MRI-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Chichen
    Tu, Xiang
    Dai, Jindong
    Xiong, Xingyu
    Cai, Diming
    Yang, Ling
    Zhang, Mengni
    Qiu, Shi
    Lin, Tianhai
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [24] MRI T2w Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models in Imaging Simulated Biopsy Add Diagnostic Value to PI-RADS in Predicting Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Diagnostic Study
    Liu, Jia-Cheng
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Chun, Tsun-Tsun
    Yao, Chi
    Huang, Da
    Wong, Hoi-Lung
    Lai, Chun-Ting
    Tsang, Chiu-Fung
    Ho, Sze-Ho
    Ng, Tsui-Lin
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    Na, Rong
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [25] Is multiparametric MRI always needed in biopsy-naïve patients with abnormal digital rectal examination? A single-institutional experience combining clinical and micro-ultrasonography-based factors to optimize prostate cancer detection
    Avolio, Pier Paolo
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Maffei, Davide
    Fasulo, Vittorio
    Frego, Nicola
    Saitta, Cesare
    de Carne, Fabio
    Paciotti, Marco
    Saita, Alberto
    Hurle, Rodolfo
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Casale, Paolo
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)