Of sailors and divers: How researchers use energy scenarios

被引:36
作者
Braunreiter, Lukas [1 ,2 ]
Blumer, Yann Benedict [1 ]
机构
[1] ZHAW Winterthur, Ctr Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Sch Management & Law, Stadthausstr 14, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, USYS Transdisciplinar Lab, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Scenarios; Energy systems; Modelling; Energy futures; FUTURES; METAANALYSIS; INSIGHTS; MODEL; GAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scenarios are a key instrument to guide decision-making in the face of an uncertain future. In the field of energy, scenarios are often published to inform external stakeholders who are not part of the scenario development. This study explores how researchers, a key stakeholder group in shaping the energy future, use energy scenarios. It analyses the case of Switzerland, where several competing scenarios have been developed in reaction to the governmental decision to phase-out nuclear power. 16 structured in-depth interviews with researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds were conducted. While most interviewees use public energy scenarios, there are two contrasting user types. The first group, labelled divers, primarily uses scenarios as a data source, whereas the other group, the sailors, refers to them as plausible energy futures. We identified different interpretations of scenario content between sailors and divers, which result from the quantitative modelling on which contemporary energy scenarios are based. Due to a lack of guidance from modellers and missing qualitative information, energy scenarios are prone to misconceptions and distortions in their interpretation by external users.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 126
页数:9
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [51] Simulation versus Optimisation: Theoretical Positions in Energy System Modelling
    Lund, Henrik
    Arler, Finn
    Ostergaard, Poul Alberg
    Hvelplund, Frede
    Connolly, David
    Mathiesen, Brian Vad
    Karnoe, Peter
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (07)
  • [52] Rethinking the role of scenarios: Participatory scripting of low-carbon scenarios for France
    Mathy, Sandrine
    Fink, Meike
    Bibas, Ruben
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 77 : 176 - 190
  • [53] The unseen uncertainties in climate change: reviewing comprehension of an IPCC scenario graph
    McMahon, Rosemarie
    Stauffacher, Michael
    Knutti, Reto
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 133 (02) : 141 - 154
  • [54] Scenario planning at British Airways - A case study
    Moyer, K
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1996, 29 (02) : 172 - 181
  • [55] Nitsch J.:., 2012, Langfristszenarien und Strategien fur den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berucksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global. Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)
  • [56] Energy scenarios: the value and limits of scenario analysis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 6 (04)
  • [57] Energy scientists must show their workings
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 542 (7642) : 393 - 393
  • [58] Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    Hawkes, Adam
    Keirstead, James
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 33 : 74 - 86
  • [59] "Thinking About Tomorrows": Scenarios, Global Environmental Politics, and Social Science Scholarship
    Pulver, Simone
    VanDeveer, Stacy D.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 9 (02) : 1 - 13
  • [60] Scenarios and early warnings as dynamic capabilities to frame managerial attention
    Ramirez, Rafael
    Osterman, Riku
    Gronquist, Daniel
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (04) : 825 - 838