Bioequivalence Study Designs for Generic Solid Oral Anticancer Drug Products: Scientific and Regulatory Considerations

被引:5
作者
Kaur, Paramjeet [1 ]
Chaurasia, Chandra S. [1 ]
Davit, Barbara M. [1 ]
Conner, Dale P. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Off Gener Drugs, Div Bioequivalence, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
anticancer; bioequivalence; generics; guidances; pharmacokinetics; 6-MERCAPTOPURINE; METHOTREXATE; BEXAROTENE;
D O I
10.1002/jcph.163
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) between the test and reference products is an integral part of generic drug approval process. A sound BE study design is pivotal to the successful demonstration of BE of generic drugs to their corresponding reference listed drug product. Generally, BE of systemically acting oral dosage forms is demonstrated in a crossover, single-dose in vivo study in healthy subjects. The determination of BE of solid oral anticancer drug products is associated with its own unique challenges due to the serious safety risks involved. Unlike typical BE study in healthy subjects, the safety issues often necessitate conducting BE studies in cancer patients. Such BE studies of an anticancer drug should be conducted without disturbing the patients' therapeutic dosing regimen. Attributes such as drug permeability and solubility, pharmacokinetics, dosing regimen, and approved therapeutic indication(s) are considered in the BE study design of solid anticancer drug products. To streamline the drug approval process, the Division of Bioequivalence posts the Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products guidances on the FDA public website. The objective of this article is to illustrate the scientific and regulatory considerations in the design of BE studies for generic solid oral anticancer drug products through examples.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Single-dose rexinoid rapidly and specifically suppresses serum thyrotropin in normal subjects [J].
Golden, Wendy M. ;
Weber, Katie B. ;
Hernandez, Teri L. ;
Sherman, Steven I. ;
Woodmansee, Whitney W. ;
Haugen, Bryan R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2007, 92 (01) :124-130
[12]   Clinical and experimental pharmacokinetic interaction between 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate [J].
Innocenti, F ;
Danesi, R ;
DiPaolo, A ;
Lora, B ;
Favre, C ;
Nardi, M ;
Bocci, G ;
Nardini, D ;
Macchia, P ;
DelTacca, M .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 37 (05) :409-414
[13]   Novel cytotoxic drugs: Old challenges, new solutions [J].
Ismae, Gustavo F. V. ;
Rosa, Daniela Dornelles ;
Mano, Max S. ;
Awada, Ahmad .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2008, 34 (01) :81-91
[14]  
Kaur P, 2011, J CLIN PHARMACOL, V51, P1363
[15]   Lack of effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral bexarotene in healthy subjects. [J].
Kuan, H ;
Loewen, G ;
Geiser, R .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 77 (02) :P74-P74
[16]   Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy [J].
Liu, G ;
Franssen, E ;
Fitch, MI ;
Warner, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) :110-115
[17]  
Luken J, 1995, CANC CARE PREVENTION, P77
[18]  
Rani S., 2004, Indian Journal of Pharmacology, V36, P209
[19]  
Teva Pharmaceutical USA, 2011, PUR MERC TABL LAB AP
[20]  
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1999, APPR PACK NDA 021055