Standstill Frequency Response Test and Validation of a Large Hydrogenerator

被引:20
作者
Belqorchi, Abdelghafour [1 ]
Karaagac, Ulas [2 ]
Mahseredjian, Jean [3 ]
Kamwa, Innocent [4 ]
机构
[1] Hydro Quebec, Montreal, PQ H2Z 1A4, Canada
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Polytech Montreal, Dept Elect Engn, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[4] Hydro Quebec Res Inst IREQ, Varennes, PQ J3X 1S1, Canada
关键词
Equivalent circuits; frequency response; hydrogenerator; operational parameters; parameter determination; salient pole; synchronous machine; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSIENTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2889510
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper intends to contribute to the revision process of the IEEE Standard 115 by demonstrating the applicability of the standstill frequency response (SSFR) test on large salient pole hydrogenerators. The presented SSFR tests are carried out on a 55.6-MVA salient pole machine with laminated rotor, non-continuous damper windings, and a nonintegral slot number. The IEEE-115 SSFR test procedure is applied with special care to rotor positioning as well as accurate data acquisition in the low-frequency range. The maximum likelihood estimation method is utilized for machine parameter identification from the SSFR tests. Obtained parameters are compared with design values in addition to the ones obtained using traditional "sudden no-load three-phase short-circuit," Dalton-Cameron and "open stator d-axis transient time constant" methods. The accuracy of parameters is also confirmed by comparing the measured three-phase short-circuit current waveforms with the ones obtained by simulating the SSFR-based machine models in an electromagnetic transient -type software. Unlike previous SSFR test cases on large salient pole hydrogenerators, accurate results are obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:2261 / 2269
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahrabian G, 2001, CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 2001, VOLS I AND II, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P545, DOI 10.1109/CCECE.2001.933742
[2]  
Ametek Scientific Instruments, SOL 1260A TECHN SPEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SYMB MATH TOOLB US G
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, 1110 IEEE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 115 IEEE, P1
[6]  
Azuaje C. J., 1997, P INV PAN SESS SSFR
[7]   Standstill Frequency Response Test on a Synchronous Machine Extended With Damper Bar Measurements [J].
Bladh, Johan ;
Wallin, Mattias ;
Saarinen, Linn ;
Lundin, Urban .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2016, 31 (01) :46-56
[8]   CAUSES OF DISCREPANCIES ON CALCULATION OF ROTOR QUANTITIES AND EXACT EQUIVALENT DIAGRAMS OF SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE [J].
CANAY, IM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1969, PA88 (07) :1114-&
[9]   Experience with Standstill Frequency Response (SSFR) testing and analysis of salient pole synchronous machines [J].
Dandeno, PL ;
Karmaker, HC ;
Azuaje, C ;
Glinkowski, M ;
Kamwa, I ;
Oliveira, S ;
Salon, SJ ;
Saunders, RM ;
Umans, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 1999, 14 (04) :1209-1216
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF DETAILED TURBOGENERATOR EQUIVALENT-CIRCUITS FROM STANDSTILL FREQUENCY-RESPONSE MEASUREMENTS [J].
DANDENO, PL ;
PORAY, AT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1981, 100 (04) :1646-1655