Street-level collaborative governance for urban regeneration: How were conflicts resolved at grassroot level?

被引:4
作者
Wang, Huanming [1 ]
Ran, Bing [2 ]
Li, Yanbo [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Penn State Harrisburg, Sch Publ Affairs, Middletown, PA 19355 USA
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Collaborative governance; street-level governance; urban regeneration; conflicts; stakeholder interactions; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; POLICY; POWER; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; CROSS; GENERALIZABILITY; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/07352166.2022.2133725
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Urban regeneration is one of the most important public administration issues facing modern cities. While abundant studies have focused on the state-led or market-based governance modes of large urban regeneration projects, relatively fewer studies investigate the collaborative governance mode, especially on the numerous street-level small-scale regeneration projects. Street-level small-scale regeneration projects directly touch on citizens' life and impact governance effectiveness at grassroot level. This paper studies dynamics of collaborative governance of a street-level regeneration that can balance multiple regeneration objectives and successfully address conflicts and tensions inherent in such projects. Our findings are significant in confirming the applicability of the basic tenets of collaborative governance in grassroot level and pointing out some key differences between large-scale collaborative governance projects and street-level small-scale projects in how governance effectiveness could be achieved through different stakeholders' interactions in urban regeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1743
页数:21
相关论文
共 109 条
[51]   Fostering and planning urban regeneration: the governance of cultural districts in Copenhagen [J].
Lidegaard, Christina ;
Nuccio, Massimiliano ;
Bille, Trine .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2018, 26 (01) :1-19
[52]   A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese 'villages in the city' [J].
Lin, Yanliu ;
Hao, Pu ;
Geertman, Stan .
URBAN STUDIES, 2015, 52 (10) :1774-1790
[53]   System Building and Multistakeholder Involvement in Public Participatory Community Planning through Both Collaborative- and Micro-Regeneration [J].
Liu, Lixin ;
Chen, Jiawen ;
Cai, Qingnan ;
Huang, Yaofu ;
Lang, Wei .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) :1-19
[54]  
Loeffler E., 2021, Co-production of public services and outcomes
[55]   Conceptualising Sustainability in UK Urban Regeneration: a Discursive Formation [J].
Lombardi, D. Rachel ;
Porter, Libby ;
Barber, Austin ;
Rogers, Chris D. F. .
URBAN STUDIES, 2011, 48 (02) :273-296
[56]   Collaborative planning - Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice [J].
Margerum, RD .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2002, 21 (03) :237-253
[57]  
McNamara MW, 2016, ROUTL RES PUB ADMIN, V13, P65
[58]   Partners in regeneration: constructing a local regime for urban management? [J].
Miller, C .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 1999, 27 (03) :343-358
[59]  
Naik M., 2020, Urbanisation, V5, P102, DOI [10.1177/2455747120971987, DOI 10.1177/2455747120971987]
[60]   Local government partnership working: a space odyssey. Or, journeys through the dilemmas of public and private sector boundary-spanning actors [J].
Nicholson, John ;
Orr, Kevin .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2016, 44 (02) :269-287