Information Security Risk Assessment in Critical Infrastructure: A Hybrid MCDM Approach

被引:48
作者
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
Goranin, Nikolaj [2 ]
Nurusheva, Assel [3 ]
Boranbayev, Seilkhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Sauletekio 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Fundamental Sci, Sauletekio 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Satpayev St 2, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
关键词
information security; fuzzy; risk assessment; infrastructure; AHP; Delphi method; Eckenrode method; MCDM; DECISION-MAKING METHODS; SOFTWARE PROJECTS; FAILURE MODE; MANAGEMENT; FUZZY; CRITERIA; SELECTION; WASPAS; FMEA; ALTERNATIVES;
D O I
10.15388/Informatica.2019.203
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The risk analysis has always been one of the essential procedures for any areas. The majority of security incidents occur because of ignoring risks or their inaccurate assessment. It is especially dangerous for critical infrastructures. Thus, the article is devoted to the description of the developed model of risk assessment for the essential infrastructures. The goal of the model is to provide a reliable method for multifaceted risk assessment of information infrastructure. The purpose of the article is to present a developed model based on integrated MCDM approaches that allow to correctly assess the risks of the critical information infrastructures.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 211
页数:25
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Multi-objective reservoir operation under emergency condition: Abbaspour reservoir case study with non-functional spillways [J].
Akbari, M. ;
Afshar, A. ;
Mousavi, S. J. .
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2014, 7 (04) :374-384
[2]   Risk Measurement and Risk Modelling Using Applications of Vine Copulas [J].
Allen, David E. ;
McAleer, Michael ;
Singh, Abhay K. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (10)
[3]   Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review [J].
Allesch, Astrid ;
Brunner, Paul H. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (06) :461-473
[4]   Risk assessment in ERP projects [J].
Aloini, Davide ;
Dulmin, Riccardo ;
Mininno, Valeria .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 37 (03) :183-199
[5]   A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Herath, Gamini .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) :2535-2548
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J ENG APPL SCI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EKON ISTRAZ, DOI DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517613
[8]  
Bamakan SMH, 2015, INT J ENTERP INF SYS, V11, P63, DOI [10.4018/ijeis.2015100103, 10.4018/IJEIS.2015100103]
[9]   Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment [J].
Bannerman, Paul L. .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2008, 81 (12) :2118-2133
[10]   The Value of Information for Managing Contaminated Sediments [J].
Bates, Matthew E. ;
Sparrevik, Magnus ;
de Lichy, Nicolas ;
Linkov, Igor .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (16) :9478-9485