Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Sun, Zhenqiang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xianbo [1 ]
Wang, Haijiang [1 ]
Ma, Ming [3 ]
Zhao, Zeliang [1 ]
Wang, Qisan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Canc Res Inst, Res Lab Dis Genom, Changsha 410078, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Urumqi 830001, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
low rectal cancer; abdominoperineal resection; sphincter-preserving; clinicopathological features; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RISK-FACTORS; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; INVASION;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2015.2552
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to identify the factors associated with the use of sphincter-preserving resection (SPR) surgery for the treatment of low rectal cancer. A total of 330 patients with histopathologically confirmed low rectal cancer were divided into two groups, namely the abdominoperineal resection (APR) and sphincter-preserving (SP) groups. For SPR factor analysis, the chi(2) test was performed as the univariate analysis, while a logistic regression test was conducted as the multivariate analysis. Of the 330 patients, 192 cases (58.18%) received SPR surgery and 138 cases (41.82%) underwent an APR. Univariate analysis results revealed that the sphincter-preserving factor was significantly associated with age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), total infiltrated circumference, distance of the tumor from the anal verge (DTAV), depth of invasion and tumor grade (P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant associations with family medical history, diabetes history, venous tumor embolism, growth type, tumor length, lymphatic metastasis and level of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that the sphincter-preserving factor was strongly associated with DTAV and the depth of invasion, with significant statistical difference (P<0.05). Therefore, selecting SPR surgery for patients with low rectal cancer is dependent on age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, the total infiltrated circumference, DTAV, depth of invasion and tumor grade. In addition, DTAV and the depth of invasion are independent risk factors for the selection of SPR surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 490
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Local control of sphincter-preserving procedures and abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis
    Okamura, Ryosuke
    Hida, Koya
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Akagi, Tomonori
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Yamamoto, Michio
    Ota, Mitsuyoshi
    Matoba, Shuichiro
    Bando, Hiroyuki
    Goto, Saori
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2017, 1 (03): : 199 - 207
  • [42] Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes
    Dimitriou, Nikoletta
    Michail, Othon
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Griniatsos, John
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 7 (07) : 55 - 70
  • [43] Risk Factors for Bowel Dysfunction After Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument
    Ihn, Myong Hoon
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Kim, Duck-Woo
    Oh, Heung-Kwon
    Lee, Soo Young
    Hong, Sa Min
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (08) : 958 - 966
  • [44] Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a highly demanding procedure
    Katsios, Christos G.
    Baltogiannis, Georgios
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3241 - 3243
  • [45] Low rectal cancer:Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients,techniques and outcomes
    Nikoletta Dimitriou
    Othon Michail
    Dimitrios Moris
    John Griniatsos
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2015, (07) : 55 - 70
  • [46] Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis
    Shin, Jung Kyong
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Park, Yoon Ah
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (04): : 2623 - 2630
  • [47] Risk factor for permanent stoma and incontinence quality of life after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer without a diverting stoma
    Miura, Takuya
    Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki
    Morohashi, Hajime
    Yoshida, Tatsuya
    Sato, Kentaro
    Hakamada, Kenichi
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 2 (01): : 79 - 86
  • [48] Postoperative Bowel Function After Anal Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Surgery: Risks Factors, Diagnostic Modalities, and Management
    Cura Pales, Chris George
    An, Sanghyun
    Paolo Cruz, Jan
    Kim, Kwangmin
    Kim, Youngwan
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 160 - 166
  • [49] Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer
    Wu, Yaoqiang
    Li, Zhongguo
    Yu, Fuxiang
    Chen, Daxin
    Jiang, Feng
    Qu, Ruixin
    Xue, Hongwei
    Bo, Jianbo
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (02): : 899 - 906
  • [50] Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection: A study in Thai patients
    Ekkarat, Patomphon
    Boonpipattanapong, Teeranut
    Tantiphlachiva, Kasaya
    Sangkhathat, Surasak
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 39 (04) : 225 - 231