Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Sun, Zhenqiang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Xianbo [1 ]
Wang, Haijiang [1 ]
Ma, Ming [3 ]
Zhao, Zeliang [1 ]
Wang, Qisan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Canc Res Inst, Res Lab Dis Genom, Changsha 410078, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Urumqi 830001, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
low rectal cancer; abdominoperineal resection; sphincter-preserving; clinicopathological features; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RISK-FACTORS; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; INVASION;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2015.2552
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to identify the factors associated with the use of sphincter-preserving resection (SPR) surgery for the treatment of low rectal cancer. A total of 330 patients with histopathologically confirmed low rectal cancer were divided into two groups, namely the abdominoperineal resection (APR) and sphincter-preserving (SP) groups. For SPR factor analysis, the chi(2) test was performed as the univariate analysis, while a logistic regression test was conducted as the multivariate analysis. Of the 330 patients, 192 cases (58.18%) received SPR surgery and 138 cases (41.82%) underwent an APR. Univariate analysis results revealed that the sphincter-preserving factor was significantly associated with age, gender, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), total infiltrated circumference, distance of the tumor from the anal verge (DTAV), depth of invasion and tumor grade (P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant associations with family medical history, diabetes history, venous tumor embolism, growth type, tumor length, lymphatic metastasis and level of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that the sphincter-preserving factor was strongly associated with DTAV and the depth of invasion, with significant statistical difference (P<0.05). Therefore, selecting SPR surgery for patients with low rectal cancer is dependent on age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, the total infiltrated circumference, DTAV, depth of invasion and tumor grade. In addition, DTAV and the depth of invasion are independent risk factors for the selection of SPR surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 490
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oncological results in rectal cancer patients with a subcentimetre distal margin after laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving surgery
    Zhang, Chenghai
    Cui, Ming
    Xing, Jiadi
    Yang, Hong
    Su, Xiangqian
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (06) : 1454 - 1460
  • [22] Clinical parameters predictive for sphincter-preserving surgery and prognostic outcome in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer
    Partl, Richard
    Magyar, Marton
    Hassler, Eva
    Langsenlehner, Tanja
    Kapp, Karin Sigrid
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [23] The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Rui
    Dai, Ziyi
    Zhang, Yin
    Lu, Junyang
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Xiao, Yi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (12) : 7249 - 7258
  • [24] Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving operations for ultra-low rectal cancer
    Kojima, Tadahiro
    Hino, Hitoshi
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    Yamaoka, Yusuke
    Manabe, Shoichi
    Kato, Shunichiro
    Hanaoka, Marie
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2022, 6 (05): : 643 - 650
  • [25] A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Zeng, Wei-gen
    Liu, Meng-jia
    Zhou, Zhi-xiang
    Wang, Zhen-jun
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (11) : 1175 - 1183
  • [26] Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?
    Johannes Klose
    Ignazio Tarantino
    Yakup Kulu
    Thomas Bruckner
    Stefan Trefz
    Thomas Schmidt
    Martin Schneider
    Thilo Hackert
    Markus W. Büchler
    Alexis Ulrich
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017, 21 : 885 - 891
  • [27] Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy
    Nozawa, H.
    Sakamoto, A.
    Murono, K.
    Sasaki, K.
    Emoto, S.
    Ishihara, S.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [28] Delayed anastomotic leakage following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
    Shin, Ui Sup
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 25 (07) : 843 - 849
  • [29] Sphincter-Preserving Operations Following Preoperative Chemoradiation: An Alternative to Abdominoperineal Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer?
    Jung Wook Huh
    Eun Joo Jung
    Yoon Ah Park
    Kang Young Lee
    Seung-Kook Sohn
    World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 1116 - 1123
  • [30] Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer
    Zhou, Xiao-Cong
    Guan, Shi-Wei
    Ke, Fei-Yue
    Dhamija, Gaurav
    Wang, Qiang
    Chen, Bang-Fei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 30 (18) : 2418 - 2439