Parametric Inference and Dynamic State Recovery From Option Panels

被引:61
作者
Andersen, Torben G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fusari, Nicola [4 ]
Todorov, Viktor [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Dept Finance, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] CREATES, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Carey Business Sch, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Option pricing; inference; risk premia; jumps; latent state vector; stochastic volatility; specification testing; stable convergence; RISK PREMIA; VOLATILITY; SPECIFICATION; JUMP; MODELS; FEARS;
D O I
10.3982/ECTA10719
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We develop a new parametric estimation procedure for option panels observed with error. We exploit asymptotic approximations assuming an ever increasing set of option prices in the moneyness (cross-sectional) dimension, but with a fixed time span. We develop consistent estimators for the parameters and the dynamic realization of the state vector governing the option price dynamics. The estimators converge stably to a mixed-Gaussian law and we develop feasible estimators for the limiting variance. We also provide semiparametric tests for the option price dynamics based on the distance between the spot volatility extracted from the options and one constructed nonparametrically from high-frequency data on the underlying asset. Furthermore, we develop new tests for the day-by-day model fit over specific regions of the volatility surface and for the stability of the risk-neutral dynamics over time. A comprehensive Monte Carlo study indicates that the inference procedures work well in empirically realistic settings. In an empirical application to S&P 500 index options, guided by the new diagnostic tests, we extend existing asset pricing models by allowing for a flexible dynamic relation between volatility and priced jump tail risk. Importantly, we document that the priced jump tail risk typically responds in a more pronounced and persistent manner than volatility to large negative market shocks.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1145
页数:65
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Andersen T. G., 2015, ECONOMETRICA S, V83
[2]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[3]   Modeling and forecasting realized volatility [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T ;
Diebold, FX ;
Labys, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (02) :579-625
[4]   Cross-section regression with common shocks [J].
Andrews, DWK .
ECONOMETRICA, 2005, 73 (05) :1551-1585
[5]   Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, OE ;
Shephard, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2002, 64 :253-280
[6]   Limit theorems for bipower variation in financial econometrics [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. ;
Graversen, Svend Erik ;
Jacod, Jean ;
Shephard, Neil .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2006, 22 (04) :677-719
[7]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OleE., 2006, Journal of financial Econometrics, V4, p1. 1, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI022
[8]   Post-'87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market [J].
Bates, DS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2000, 94 (1-2) :181-238
[9]   Tails, Fears, and Risk Premia [J].
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Todorov, Viktor .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2011, 66 (06) :2165-2211
[10]   Model specification and risk premia: Evidence from futures options [J].
Broadie, Mark ;
Chernov, Mikhail ;
Johannes, Michael .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (03) :1453-1490