Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: Towards a pan-European perspective

被引:174
作者
Edwards, David [1 ]
Jay, Marion [2 ]
Jensen, Frank S. [3 ]
Lucas, Beatriz [4 ]
Marzano, Mariella [1 ]
Montagne, Claire [5 ]
Peace, Andrew [1 ]
Weiss, Gerhard [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] No Res Stn, Roslin EH25 9SY, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Freiburg, Inst Forest & Environm Policy, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[4] CTFC, ES-08010 Barcelona, Spain
[5] UMR INRA AgroParisTech ENGREF, Lab Econ Forestiere, F-54042 Nancy, France
[6] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci BOKU, European Forest Inst EFICEEC, Cent E European Reg Off, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[7] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci BOKU, Inst Forest Environm & Nat Resource Policy, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Public preference; Recreation; Forest structure; Delphi; Culture; Europe; PREDICTING SCENIC BEAUTY; PERCEPTION; VALUES; STANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents the findings of a Delphi survey, conducted in four European regions (Great Britain, Nordic Region, Central Europe and Iberia) to assess public preferences for 12 key structural attributes of forests. The objectives were to explore the extent to which generalisations can be made about preferences of forests as sites for recreational use, and how regional variations in preferences may be explained in terms of cultural differences in local populations and bio-physical characteristics of the forests in each region. Survey participants were asked to classify the relationship, and quantify the relative importance, of each attribute to the recreational value of forests in their respective regions. While there was agreement across regions on the type of relationship and level of importance for many of the attributes, there were some notable outliers, for example 'residue from felling and thinning' scored lowest in Central Europe and highly in the other three regions. Indicative explanations for regional variations are proposed, focusing on combinations of cultural and biophysical factors, and drawing on the literature on forest preferences, place attachment and cultural landscapes. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, 19 IUFRO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1976, RM167 USDA FOR SERV
  • [3] [Anonymous], D233 EFORWOOD FOR RE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, The Delphi Method
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, SHAPING FOREST COMMU
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group
  • [8] How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments
    Arnberger, Arne
    Aikoh, Tetsuya
    Eder, Renate
    Shoji, Yasushi
    Mieno, Taro
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2010, 9 (03) : 215 - 225
  • [9] ARTHUR LM, 1977, FOREST SCI, V23, P151
  • [10] PUBLIC RESPONSE TO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VISUALLY DISTINGUISHABLE FOREST STANDS IN A RECREATION AREA
    AXELSSONLINDGREN, C
    SORTE, G
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1987, 14 (03) : 211 - 217