Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice

被引:74
作者
El Maghraoui, A [1 ]
Zounon, AAD
Jroundi, I
Nouijai, A
Ghazi, M
Achemlal, L
Bezza, A
Tazi, MA
Abouqual, R
机构
[1] Military Hosp Mohammed 5, Rheumatol & Phys Rehabil Dept, Rabat, Morocco
[2] Fac Med & Pharm, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rabat, Morocco
[3] Minist Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
chronic rheumatic diseases; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); healthy volunteers; osteoporosis; post-menopausal women; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-005-1916-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are frequently performed repeatedly for each patient. Subsequent BMD measurements allow reproducibility to be assessed. Previous studies have suggested that reproducibility may be influenced by age and clinical status. The purpose of the study was to examine the reproducibility of BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the practical value of different measures of reproducibility in three distinct groups of subjects: healthy young volunteers, postmenopausal women and patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Two hundred twenty-two subjects underwent two subsequent BMD measurements of the spine and hip. There were 60 young healthy subjects, 102 postmenopausal women and 60 patients with chronic rheumatic diseases (33 rheumatoid arthritis, 10 ankylosing spondylitis and 10 other systemic diseases). Forty-five patients (75%) among the third group were receiving corticosteroids. Reproducibility was expressed as the smallest detectable difference (SDD), coefficient of variation (CV), least significant change (LSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sources of variation were investigated by linear regression analysis. The median interval between measurements was 0 days (range 0-7). The mean difference (SD) between the measurements (g/cm(2)) was -0.0001 (+/- 0.003) and -0.0004 (+/- 0.002) at L1-L4 and the total hip, respectively. At L1-L4 and the total hip, SDD (g/cm(2)) was +/- 0.04 and +/- 0.02, CV (%) was 2.02 and 1.29, and LSC (%) 5.60 and 3.56, respectively. The ICC at the spine and hip was 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. Only a minimal difference existed between the groups. Reproducibility in the three groups studied was good. In a repeated DXA scan, a BMD change, the least significant change (LSC) or the SDD should be regarded as significant. Use of the SDD is preferable to use of the CV and LSC because of its independence from BMD and its expression in absolute units. Expressed as SDD, a BMD change of at least +/- 0.04 g/cm(2) at L1-L4 and +/- 0.02 g/cm(2) at the total hip should be considered significant. This reproducibility seems independent from age and clinical status and improved in the hips by measuring the dual femur.
引用
收藏
页码:1742 / 1748
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of hip rotation on bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Celik, Oezguer
    Salci, Yasar
    Manisali, Metin
    Korkusuz, Feza
    [J]. EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 20 (02): : 71 - 77
  • [42] Relationship of gray values in cone beam computed tomography and bone mineral density obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Shokri, Abbas
    Ghanbari, Mahsa
    Maleki, Fatemeh Hafez
    Ramezani, Leila
    Amini, Payam
    Tapak, Leili
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 128 (03): : 319 - 331
  • [43] Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Shetty, Sahana
    John, Bimi
    Mohan, Sofia
    Paul, Thomas Vizhalil
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [44] Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry of Both Hips Helps Appropriate Diagnosis of Low Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporosis
    Afzelius, Pia
    Garding, Mette-Marie
    Molsted, Stig
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (03)
  • [45] Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Sahana Shetty
    Bimi John
    Sofia Mohan
    Thomas Vizhalil Paul
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2020, 15
  • [46] Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study
    Bandirali, Michele
    Poloni, Alessandro
    Sconfienza, Luca Maria
    Messina, Carmelo
    Papini, Giacomo Davide Edoardo
    Petrini, Marcello
    Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : 2194 - 2198
  • [47] COMPARISON AND INVESTIGATION OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN OPPOSING FEMORA BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    LILLEY, J
    WALTERS, BG
    HEATH, DA
    DROLC, Z
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 2 (06) : 274 - 278
  • [48] MEASUREMENT OF FOREARM BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN NORMAL WOMEN BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    RYAN, PJ
    BLAKE, GM
    FOGELMAN, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 65 (770) : 127 - 131
  • [49] Phalangeal Densitometry Compared With Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Women
    Dhainaut, Alvilde
    Rohde, Gudrun
    Hoff, Mari
    Syversen, Unni
    Haugeberg, Glenn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (12) : 1789 - 1795
  • [50] Errors in Patient Positioning for Bone Mineral Density Assessment by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry: Effect of Technologist Retraining
    Promma, Sasivimol
    Sritara, Chanika
    Wipuchwongsakorn, Saowanee
    Chuamsaamarkkee, Krisanat
    Utamakul, Chirawat
    Chamroonrat, Wichana
    Kositwattanarerk, Arpakorn
    Anongpornjossakul, Yoch
    Thamnirat, Kanungnij
    Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2018, 21 (02) : 252 - 259